How useful are transcendental arguments for critical realist ontology? A Response to Morgan.

The article presents views on transcendental arguments and its relevance to other school of thoughts. The article discusses meta-philosophical naturalist positions and social ontology. The article also discusses the shortcomings of human being to understand or interpret everything practically and na...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Journal of Critical Realism Vol. 5; no. 2; pp. 344 - 354
Autor principal: Kaidesoja, Tuukka
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Taylor & Francis Ltd 2006
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=22630115&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 22630115
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        14767430
        7DS
      jtl: Journal of Critical Realism
      issn: 14767430
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: 2006
      vid: 5
      iid: 2
      pid: 377
      pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd
    artinfo:
      ui:
        22630115
        10.1163/157251306778537193
      ppf: 344
      ppct: 10
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
            size: 101KB
      tig:
        atl: How useful are transcendental arguments for critical realist ontology? A Response to Morgan.
      aug:
        au: Kaidesoja, Tuukka
      su:
        Ontology
        Naturalism
        Critical realism
        Spacetime
        Transcendence (Philosophy)
        Transcendentalism (Philosophy)
        Theory of knowledge
      sug:
        subj:
          Ontology
          Naturalism
          Critical realism
          Spacetime
          Transcendence (Philosophy)
          Transcendentalism (Philosophy)
          Theory of knowledge
      ab: The article presents views on transcendental arguments and its relevance to other school of thoughts. The article discusses meta-philosophical naturalist positions and social ontology. The article also discusses the shortcomings of human being to understand or interpret everything practically and naturalism.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of Journal of Critical Realism is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: Journal of Critical Realism
      holder: Taylor & Francis Ltd
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2006
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N