The (Im)Possibilities of Writing the Self- Writing: French Poststructural Theory and Autoethnography.

Poststructural theories problematize taken-for-granted humanist notions of the subject as capable of self-knowledge and self-articulation while simultaneously providing a rationale for incorporating the personal into research. The body, emotions, and lived experience become texts to be written and r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Cultural Studies/Critical Methodologies Vol. 6; no. 4; pp. 474 - 496
Autor principal: Gannon, Susanne
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Sage Publications Inc. Nov2006
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=22774096&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 22774096
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        15327086
        FQ9
      jtl: Cultural Studies/Critical Methodologies
      issn: 15327086
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Nov2006
      vid: 6
      iid: 4
      pid: 344
      pub: Sage Publications Inc.
    artinfo:
      ui:
        22774096
        10.1177/1532708605285734
      ppf: 474
      ppct: 22
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: The (Im)Possibilities of Writing the Self- Writing: French Poststructural Theory and Autoethnography.
      aug:
        au: Gannon, Susanne
        affil: University of Western Sydney
      su:
        Poststructuralism
        Theory of self-knowledge
        Ethnology
        Humanists
        France
      sug:
        subj:
          France
          Poststructuralism
          Theory of self-knowledge
          Ethnology
          Humanists
      keyword:
        autobiography
        autoethnography
        poststructural
        subjectivity
        writing
      ab: Poststructural theories problematize taken-for-granted humanist notions of the subject as capable of self-knowledge and self-articulation while simultaneously providing a rationale for incorporating the personal into research. The body, emotions, and lived experience become texts to be written and read in autoethnography. However, a paradox arises for poststructural autoethnography in that autoethnographic research presumes that subjects can speak for themselves, whereas poststructuralism disrupts this presumption and stresses the (im)possibilities of writing the self. This article explores the work of pivotal French poststructuralists-Foucault, Barthes, Derrida, and Cixous--as they write themselves and put those selves under erasure in writing. The author identifies the implications for a reconfigured poststructural autoethnography, tracing textual strategies that evoke fractured, fragmented subjectivities and provoke discontinuity, displacement, and estrangement. In poststructural autoethnography, the writing writes the writer as a complex (im)possible subject in a world where (self) knowledge can only ever be tentative, contingent, and situated.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2006
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N