Visceral Hacking or Packet Wanking? The Ethics of Digital Code.

Although hacking is painted as destructive and anti‐social in the eyes of the mainstream media, many hackers seek to reclaim it and its meaning as a harmless if not socially beneficial activity. One strategy is to construct a boundary between legitimate hacking and the activities of the much maligne...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Culture, Theory & Critique Vol. 47; no. 2; pp. 213 - 236
Autor principal: Best, Kirsty
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Taylor & Francis Ltd Oct2006
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=22897258&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 22897258
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        14735784
        J2K
      jtl: Culture, Theory & Critique
      issn: 14735784
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Oct2006
      vid: 47
      iid: 2
      pid: 377
      pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd
    artinfo:
      ui:
        22897258
        10.1080/14735780600961809
      ppf: 213
      ppct: 23
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Visceral Hacking or Packet Wanking? The Ethics of Digital Code.
      aug:
        au: Best, Kirsty
      su:
        Computer hacking
        Work ethic
        Freedom of information
        Websites
        Information storage & retrieval systems
        Technology
        Computer programming
        Ethics
      sug:
        subj:
          Computer hacking
          Work ethic
          Freedom of information
          Websites
          Information storage & retrieval systems
          Technology
          Computer programming
          Ethics
      ab: Although hacking is painted as destructive and anti‐social in the eyes of the mainstream media, many hackers seek to reclaim it and its meaning as a harmless if not socially beneficial activity. One strategy is to construct a boundary between legitimate hacking and the activities of the much maligned script kiddies, inspired by a ‘hacker ethic’. This hacker ethic springs directly from hacker practice and thus emerges from the visceral register, particularly that associated with pleasure. It is also engaged in a politics of becoming which attempts to extend ethical principles of equality and freedom to information environments and applications. This paper argues that the presence of the ‘other’ of hacking continues to contaminate hacking because of the ambiguous and contradictory nature of this ethic. It argues that the ambiguities inherent in the visceral source of hacking’s ethical orientation will continue to destabilise its legitimacy. Further, hacking cannot justify itself based on appeals to the virtues of hacking skill without contradicting its own moorings in the politics of becoming. To illustrate this argument, the paper looks at a case study of script kiddies and their involvement in distributed denial of service attacks against seven corporate websites in February 2000.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2006
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N