A guide to conducting a task analysis of psychotherapeutic change.
The epistemological and methodological underpinnings of task analysis are discussed and the steps and concrete procedures for its implementation are described and exemplified in a task analysis of the resolution of unfinished business. Task analysis, a method for studying the process of change, cons...
| Publicado en: | Psychotherapy Research Vol. 17; no. 1; pp. 15 - 31 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis Ltd
Jan2007
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=23093472&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ssf uiTerm: 23093472 longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson) uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 10503307 10T jtl: Psychotherapy Research issn: 10503307 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Jan2007 vid: 17 iid: 1 pid: 377 pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd artinfo: ui: 23093472 10.1080/10503300600720390 ppf: 15 ppct: 16 formats: tig: atl: A guide to conducting a task analysis of psychotherapeutic change. aug: au: Greenberg, LeslieS. affil: Department of Psychology, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada su: Psychotherapy Change Therapeutics Task analysis Hypothesis sug: subj: Psychotherapy Change Therapeutics Task analysis Hypothesis ab: The epistemological and methodological underpinnings of task analysis are discussed and the steps and concrete procedures for its implementation are described and exemplified in a task analysis of the resolution of unfinished business. Task analysis, a method for studying the process of change, consists of two main phases: a discovery-oriented phase based on rational–empirical model building and a validation phase based on hypothesis testing. The goals of the approach are to (a) build an observationally based model of how therapeutic change occurs for a particular type of affective–cognitive problem, (b) validate the model of change, and (c) relate the process of change to outcome. Benefits and strengths of the approach are presented and factors that have impeded the use of this approach in the study of change processes are discussed. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: N holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|