Presentism and fatalism.
It is widely believed that presentism is compatible with both a libertarian view of human freedom and an unrestricted principle of bivalence. I argue that, in fact, presentists must choose between bivalence and libertarianism: if presentism is true, then either the future is open or no one is free i...
| Publicado en: | Australasian Journal of Philosophy Vol. 84; no. 4; pp. 511 - 525 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis Ltd
Dec2006
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=23233520&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 23233520 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 00048402 BHK jtl: Australasian Journal of Philosophy issn: 00048402 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Dec2006 vid: 84 iid: 4 pid: 377 pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd artinfo: ui: 23233520 10.1080/00048400601079003 ppf: 511 ppct: 14 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P size: 133KB tig: atl: Presentism and fatalism. aug: au: Rea, MichaelC. affil: University of Notre Dame su: Libertarianism Nonexistent objects (Philosophy) Fate & fatalism Choice (Psychology) Spacetime Determinism (Philosophy) sug: subj: Libertarianism Nonexistent objects (Philosophy) Fate & fatalism Choice (Psychology) Spacetime Determinism (Philosophy) ab: It is widely believed that presentism is compatible with both a libertarian view of human freedom and an unrestricted principle of bivalence. I argue that, in fact, presentists must choose between bivalence and libertarianism: if presentism is true, then either the future is open or no one is free in the way that libertarians understand freedom. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Copyright of Australasian Journal of Philosophy is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. item: Australasian Journal of Philosophy holder: Taylor & Francis Ltd dt: @attributes: year: 2006 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|