North – South? Pitfalls of dividing the world by words.

The phrase ‘North – South divide’—as well as variations such as ‘North – South gap’ or ‘North – South cleavage’—has become well established in public discourse and scholarly writing. The phrase, however, is highly problematic, as it is simplistic and as there is a substantial danger of misapprehendi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Third World Quarterly Vol. 28; no. 1; pp. 3 - 24
Main Authors: Eckl, Julian, Weber, Ralph
Format: Article
Published: Taylor & Francis Ltd Feb2007
Subjects:
Online Access:View this record in EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=24153020&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 24153020
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        01436597
        TWQ
      jtl: Third World Quarterly
      issn: 01436597
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Feb2007
      vid: 28
      iid: 1
      pid: 377
      pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd
    artinfo:
      ui:
        24153020
        10.1080/01436590601081732
      ppf: 3
      ppct: 21
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 169KB
      tig:
        atl: North – South? Pitfalls of dividing the world by words.
      aug:
        au:
          Eckl, Julian
          Weber, Ralph
        affil: Institute for Political Science at the University of St Gallen, doctoral candidates, St Gallen, Switzerland
      su:
        Discourse analysis
        Terms & phrases
        History of linguistics
        Judgment (Psychology)
        Distinction (Philosophy)
        Academic discourse
        Language & logic
        Intellectual property
        Social reality
        China
      sug:
        subj:
          China
          Discourse analysis
          Terms & phrases
          History of linguistics
          Judgment (Psychology)
          Distinction (Philosophy)
          Academic discourse
          Language & logic
          Intellectual property
          Social reality
      ab: The phrase ‘North – South divide’—as well as variations such as ‘North – South gap’ or ‘North – South cleavage’—has become well established in public discourse and scholarly writing. The phrase, however, is highly problematic, as it is simplistic and as there is a substantial danger of misapprehending it for ‘reality’ as such. The indiscriminate usage of the phrase ‘North – South divide’ overlooks the ways in which words create and shape our understanding of the world, on which we, in turn, base our judgements and decisions. The aim of the present paper is to point out specific ways through which this linguistic distinction—as much as any other—shapes our conception of (social) reality. The paper is in two parts. In the first we will initially draw out some pitfalls that inhere in the notion of a ‘North – South divide’qua notion, and then point to other pitfalls that relate to the usage of the expression. In the second part two case studies are presented to illustrate our arguments: one of them deals with China, the other with intellectual property rights.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of Third World Quarterly is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: Third World Quarterly
      holder: Taylor & Francis Ltd
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2007
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N