Policy learning in Europe: the open method of co-ordination and laboratory federalism.

This paper analyses the potential of the open method of co-ordination (OMC) and of laboratory federalism for policy innovation and learning in a multi-level system of jurisdictions. Our analysis shows that both can be seen as institutions that establish processes of generating and spreading new know...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Journal of European Public Policy Vol. 14; no. 2; pp. 227 - 248
Autores principales: Kerber, Wolfgang, Eckardt, Martina
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Taylor & Francis Ltd Mar2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=24232675&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 24232675
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        13501763
        5BM
      jtl: Journal of European Public Policy
      issn: 13501763
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Mar2007
      vid: 14
      iid: 2
      pid: 377
      pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd
    artinfo:
      ui:
        24232675
        10.1080/13501760601122480
      ppf: 227
      ppct: 21
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Policy learning in Europe: the open method of co-ordination and laboratory federalism.
      aug:
        au:
          Kerber, Wolfgang
          Eckardt, Martina
      su:
        Policy sciences
        Political planning
        Federal government
        European Union
        Europe
      sug:
        subj:
          Europe
          Policy sciences
          Political planning
          Federal government
          European Union
      keyword:
        governance
        innovation
        laboratory federalism
        policy learning
      ab: This paper analyses the potential of the open method of co-ordination (OMC) and of laboratory federalism for policy innovation and learning in a multi-level system of jurisdictions. Our analysis shows that both can be seen as institutions that establish processes of generating and spreading new knowledge about appropriate public policies. However, the respective learning mechanisms are very different: in laboratory federalism learning takes place through a purely non-centralized process of experimentation with different new policies. In comparison, the OMC relies on a benchmarking process carried out on a higher-level jurisdiction from which, in a rather centralized way, policy recommendations are derived. In both cases, serious learning problems resulting from limited transferability of experiences gained with policies and from lacking or distorting incentives arise. We find that to fully use their potential the OMC should become an integral part of laboratory federalism, thus supporting the smooth working of yardstick, interjurisdictional and regulatory competition.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2007
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N