Comment on Darley's "Special Review.".

The author offers observation on John G. Darley's review of the book "Intelligence and Cultural Differences" to which the author was a major contributor. He was perplexed as to why the book was singled out for the special rather than routine reviewing. He reveals Darley's criticism of the book. The...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Applied Psychology Vol. 36; no. 6; pp. 422 - 424
Main Author: Eells, Kenneth
Format: Article
Published: American Psychological Association Dec52
Subjects:
Online Access:View this record in EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=24658891&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 24658891
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00219010
        JAY
      jtl: Journal of Applied Psychology
      issn: 00219010
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Dec52
      vid: 36
      iid: 6
      pid: 34
      pub: American Psychological Association
    artinfo:
      ui:
        24658891
        10.1037/h0052286
      ppf: 422
      ppct: 2
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Comment on Darley's "Special Review.".
      aug:
        au: Eells, Kenneth
        affil: U. S. Naval Personnel Research Unit, San Diego, California
      su:
        Editorials
        Book reviewing
        Intelligence & Cultural Differences: A Study of Cultural Learning & Problem Solving (Book)
        Darley, John G.
        Criticism
      sug:
        subj:
          Editorials
          Book reviewing
          Intelligence & Cultural Differences: A Study of Cultural Learning & Problem Solving (Book)
          Darley, John G.
          Criticism
      ab: The author offers observation on John G. Darley's review of the book "Intelligence and Cultural Differences" to which the author was a major contributor. He was perplexed as to why the book was singled out for the special rather than routine reviewing. He reveals Darley's criticism of the book. The author stresses that not a single significant favorable comment is found in the entire review.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 1952
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N