EVALUATION OF INPUT DEVICES FOR A DATA SETTING TASK.
This study evaluates a set of numeric manual entry devices. The task required was to set numeric data into the devices. The devices evaluated in this study were: a 10-key keyboard, levers, a matrix keyboard, and rotary knobs. The criteria by which the devices were evaluated were: error rate, entry t...
| Publicado en: | Journal of Applied Psychology Vol. 46; no. 5; pp. 332 - 337 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
American Psychological Association
Oct62
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=24701188&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 24701188 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 00219010 JAY jtl: Journal of Applied Psychology issn: 00219010 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Oct62 vid: 46 iid: 5 pid: 34 pub: American Psychological Association artinfo: ui: 24701188 10.1037/h0044176 ppf: 332 ppct: 5 formats: tig: atl: EVALUATION OF INPUT DEVICES FOR A DATA SETTING TASK. aug: au: Minor, Frank J. Revesman, Stanley L. affil: International Business Machines Corporation, General Products Division, Development Laboratory, Endicott, New York su: Levers Keyboards (Electronics) Errors Measurement Time Research sug: subj: Levers Keyboards (Electronics) Errors Measurement Time Research ab: This study evaluates a set of numeric manual entry devices. The task required was to set numeric data into the devices. The devices evaluated in this study were: a 10-key keyboard, levers, a matrix keyboard, and rotary knobs. The criteria by which the devices were evaluated were: error rate, entry time, and operator preferences. A repeated measurements design was utilized. Each of 24 subjects made 175 10-digit entries into each of the 4 devices. The conclusions based upon the data are: (a) the 10-key keyboard yields a significantly lower error rate and is significantly preferred compared to the other devices. This device required significantly less time per entry compared to the level and rotary knobs. (b) The matrix device required significantly less time per entry and was significantly preferred compared to the level and rotary knobs. The matrix device does not result in a significantly lower error rate than the latter 2 devices. (c) There were no significant differences between the lever and rotary knob devices. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y dt: @attributes: year: 1962 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|