THE ATTITUDE OF THE SUBJECT IN PERSONALITY TESTING.
The article enumerates various incentives or factors which have been employed for producing cooperation on the part of subjects in personality testing. Among the factors studied include competition, economic reasons, miscellaneous obligations, personal interest, interesting material and indirect inc...
| Publicado en: | Journal of Applied Psychology Vol. 18; no. 2; pp. 165 - 178 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
American Psychological Association
Apr34
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=24753049&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 24753049 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 00219010 JAY jtl: Journal of Applied Psychology issn: 00219010 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Apr34 vid: 18 iid: 2 pid: 34 pub: American Psychological Association artinfo: ui: 24753049 10.1037/h0074033 ppf: 165 ppct: 13 formats: tig: atl: THE ATTITUDE OF THE SUBJECT IN PERSONALITY TESTING. aug: au: Vernon, Philip E. affil: St. John's College, Cambridge, England su: Psychological tests Personality Examinations Educational tests & measurements Attitude testing Intelligence tests Response rates Cooperation Educational psychology sug: subj: Psychological tests Personality Examinations Educational tests & measurements Attitude testing Intelligence tests Response rates Cooperation Educational psychology ab: The article enumerates various incentives or factors which have been employed for producing cooperation on the part of subjects in personality testing. Among the factors studied include competition, economic reasons, miscellaneous obligations, personal interest, interesting material and indirect incentives. It reveals that the reliability and validity of a pragmatic, empirical approach is determined by the usual statistical methods. However, there are claims that the empirical approach does not account the meaning of the test for the subject and the psychological factors which motivate his response. Counter arguments to this claim states that this objection was always acknowledged and the mentality of the subject is invariably considered by the psychologist who devises the test. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y dt: @attributes: year: 1934 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|