The effect of the communication output method on augmented interaction.
The experiment compared the ability of a Comprehension Model versus an Interaction Model to account for the communication performance of augmented communicators. Five dyads consisting of adults without disabilities, with one participant in each dyad randomly assigned to use an augmentative communica...
| Publicado en: | AAC: Augmentative & Alternative Communication Vol. 23; no. 2; pp. 140 - 154 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis Ltd
Jun2007
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=25048924&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 25048924 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 07434618 9OD jtl: AAC: Augmentative & Alternative Communication issn: 07434618 maglogo: Y pubinfo: dt: Jun2007 vid: 23 iid: 2 pid: 377 pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd artinfo: ui: 25048924 10.1080/07434610601045344 ppf: 140 ppct: 14 formats: tig: atl: The effect of the communication output method on augmented interaction. aug: au: Higginbotham, D. Jeffery Kim, Kyung-Eun Scally, Christine affil: University at Buffalo University of Central Florida Private Practice, Knoxville, TN, USA su: Means of communication for people with disabilities Communication devices for people with disabilities Interpersonal communication Couples Interaction model (Communication) Communication models Assistive technology Assistive listening systems Reading devices for people with disabilities sug: subj: Means of communication for people with disabilities Communication devices for people with disabilities Interpersonal communication Couples Interaction model (Communication) Communication models Assistive technology Assistive listening systems Reading devices for people with disabilities keyword: Communication aid Communication rate Communicative Discourse strategies Interaction Interface design Rate ab: The experiment compared the ability of a Comprehension Model versus an Interaction Model to account for the communication performance of augmented communicators. Five dyads consisting of adults without disabilities, with one participant in each dyad randomly assigned to use an augmentative communication device, engaged in ten direction-giving tasks in which the augmented communicator used either a Word Method (i.e., spoken words only) or a Mixed Method (i.e., mix of spoken words and letters) speech output. Results indicated an overall completion time and communication rate advantage for the Mixed Method output in most communication tasks, supporting the Interaction Model of augmented communication. The role of communication co-construction in augmented interaction and the implications of the Interaction Model for future communication device design are discussed. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y dt: @attributes: year: 2007 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|