Innateness as Closed Process Invariance.
Controversies over the innateness of cognitive structures play a persistent role in driving research in philosophy as well as cognitive science, but the appropriate way to understand the category of the innate remains in dispute. The invariantist approaches of Stich and Sober face counterexample cas...
| Publicado en: | Philosophy of Science Vol. 73; no. 3; pp. 323 - 345 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Cambridge University Press
Jul2006
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=25122642&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 25122642 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 00318248 PSC jtl: Philosophy of Science issn: 00318248 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Jul2006 vid: 73 iid: 3 pid: 15979 pub: Cambridge University Press artinfo: ui: 25122642 10.1086/515414 ppf: 323 ppct: 22 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P size: 169KB tig: atl: Innateness as Closed Process Invariance. aug: au: Mallon, Ron Weinberg, Jonathan M. affil: Department of Philosophy, University of Utah, 260 S. Central Campus Dr., Room 341, Salt Lake City, UT 84112 Department of Philosophy, Indiana University, 1033 E. Third St., Sycamore Hall 026, Bloomington, IN 47405-7005 su: Innate ideas (Philosophy) Cognitive science Nativism (Psychology) Philosophy & cognitive science Stich, Stephen Sober, Elliott Ariew, Andre Samuels, Richard sug: subj: Innate ideas (Philosophy) Cognitive science Nativism (Psychology) Philosophy & cognitive science Stich, Stephen Sober, Elliott Ariew, Andre Samuels, Richard ab: Controversies over the innateness of cognitive structures play a persistent role in driving research in philosophy as well as cognitive science, but the appropriate way to understand the category of the innate remains in dispute. The invariantist approaches of Stich and Sober face counterexample cases of traits that, though developing invariantly across different environments, nonetheless are not held by nativism partisans to count as innate. Appeals to canalization (Ariew) or to psychological primitiveness (Samuels) fail to handle this liberalism problem. We suggest a novel approach to innateness: closed process invariantism. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Copyright of Philosophy of Science is the property of Cambridge University Press and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. item: Philosophy of Science holder: Cambridge University Press dt: @attributes: year: 2006 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|