Historic Building Record and the Halifax Borough Market Doors.
In recent issues of Industrial Archaeology Review and Industrial Archaeology News, the debate concerning the form that Industrial Archaeology should take has resurfaced. In this contribution the author argues that there is now an ascendant social studies faction in the subject and that this is promo...
| Publicado en: | Industrial Archaeology Review Vol. 29; no. 1; pp. 51 - 75 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis Ltd
May2007
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=25200613&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 25200613 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 03090728 PK8 jtl: Industrial Archaeology Review issn: 03090728 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: May2007 vid: 29 iid: 1 pid: 377 pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd artinfo: ui: 25200613 10.1179/174581907X179984 ppf: 51 ppct: 24 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P size: 2.6MB tig: atl: Historic Building Record and the Halifax Borough Market Doors. aug: au: Fitzgerald, Ron su: Historic buildings Industrial archaeology Boroughs Commercialization Social sciences Halifax (England) England sug: subj: Halifax (England) England Historic buildings Industrial archaeology Boroughs Commercialization Social sciences ab: In recent issues of Industrial Archaeology Review and Industrial Archaeology News, the debate concerning the form that Industrial Archaeology should take has resurfaced. In this contribution the author argues that there is now an ascendant social studies faction in the subject and that this is promoting an alignment with conventional archaeology which is serving to undermine further the original basis in industrial technology that gave rise to Industrial Archaeology. It is further suggested that these trends largely originate in the academic world and are in consequence detached from external developments. These external developments are creating a commercial environment where the paying client is the key force and Industrial Archaeology is failing to equip itself to deal with this situation. The article discusses a number of issues concerned with the debate. It is followed by a description and analysis derived from a recent field study on the doors of the Halifax Borough Market which it is contended represent a philosophy and technique that might form a basis for a more effective and coherent approach to commercialised Industrial Archaeology, whilst at the same time preserving academic credibility. A further contribution will, with the permission of the editor, discuss the centrality of technology to Industrial Archaeology and the reasons for its currently unfashionable status. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Copyright of Industrial Archaeology Review is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. item: Industrial Archaeology Review holder: Taylor & Francis Ltd dt: @attributes: year: 2007 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|