Quasi-realism and fundamental moral error.

A common first reaction to expressivist and quasi-realist theories is the thought that, if these theories are right, there's some objectionable sense in which we can't be wrong about morality. This worry turns out to be surprisingly difficult to make stick - an account of moral error as instability...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Australasian Journal of Philosophy Vol. 85; no. 2; pp. 205 - 220
Autor principal: Egan, Andy
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Taylor & Francis Ltd Jun2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=25272296&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 25272296
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00048402
        BHK
      jtl: Australasian Journal of Philosophy
      issn: 00048402
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Jun2007
      vid: 85
      iid: 2
      pid: 377
      pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd
    artinfo:
      ui:
        25272296
        10.1080/00048400701342988
      ppf: 205
      ppct: 15
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 126KB
      tig:
        atl: Quasi-realism and fundamental moral error.
      aug:
        au: Egan, Andy
        affil: Australian National University, University of Michigan
      su:
        Expressivism (Ethics)
        Ethics
        Expression (Philosophy)
        Realism
        Philosophy
        Logical fallacies
      sug:
        subj:
          Expressivism (Ethics)
          Ethics
          Expression (Philosophy)
          Realism
          Philosophy
          Logical fallacies
      ab: A common first reaction to expressivist and quasi-realist theories is the thought that, if these theories are right, there's some objectionable sense in which we can't be wrong about morality. This worry turns out to be surprisingly difficult to make stick - an account of moral error as instability under improving changes provides the quasi-realist with the resources to explain many of our concerns about moral error. The story breaks down, though, in the case of fundamental moral error. This is where the initial worry finally sticks - quasi-realism tells me that I can't be fundamentally wrong about morality, though others can.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of Australasian Journal of Philosophy is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: Australasian Journal of Philosophy
      holder: Taylor & Francis Ltd
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2007
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N