Signals, Schemas, Subsidiaries, and Skills: Articulating the Inarticulate.

This essay examines Michael Polanyi's notion of tacit knowing and seeks to clarify and elaborate upon its claims. Tacit knowing, which is conscious although inarticulate, must be distinguished from tacit processes, which are largely unconscious. Schematization is explored as a primary tacit process...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Tradition & Discovery Vol. 33; no. 3; pp. 44 - 63
Autor principal: Gulick, Walter B.
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Polanyi Society 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=25977371&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 25977371
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        10571027
        1HK2
      jtl: Tradition & Discovery
      issn: 10571027
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: 2007
      vid: 33
      iid: 3
      pid: 26331
      pub: Polanyi Society
    artinfo:
      ui: 25977371
      ppf: 44
      ppct: 19
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 108KB
      tig:
        atl: Signals, Schemas, Subsidiaries, and Skills: Articulating the Inarticulate.
      aug:
        au: Gulick, Walter B.
      su:
        Tacit knowledge
        Polanyi, Michael, 1891-1976
        Theory of knowledge
        Consciousness
        Memory
      sug:
        subj:
          Tacit knowledge
          Polanyi, Michael, 1891-1976
          Theory of knowledge
          Consciousness
          Memory
      keyword:
        Daniel Schacter
        Eugene Gendlin
        evocation
        explicit knowing
        gestalt
        integration
        Michael Polanyi
        schema
        signal
        Susanne Langer
        symbol
        tacit knowing
      ab: This essay examines Michael Polanyi's notion of tacit knowing and seeks to clarify and elaborate upon its claims. Tacit knowing, which is conscious although inarticulate, must be distinguished from tacit processes, which are largely unconscious. Schematization is explored as a primary tacit process that humans share with all animals. This tacit process organizes and secures, in long-term memory, information of interest provided by receptors and those learned skills conducive to survival. Human empirical knowing integrates schematized subsidiaries into articulate explicitness through culturally-embedded symbols evoked in terms of felt fittingness.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of Tradition & Discovery is the property of Polanyi Society and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: Tradition & Discovery
      holder: Polanyi Society
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2007
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N