Canine Minds, Human Minds.

Sheldrake's work on canine cognition is examined from more than one standpoint. His use of the terms "social field" and "morphic field" is delineated, and in addition recent work on ethology and cognition, done by Allen and Bekoff, is set out and contrasted with Sheldrake's theorizing. The importanc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:International Journal of Applied Philosophy Vol. 21; no. 1; pp. 109 - 116
Autor principal: Duran, Jane
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Philosophy Documentation Center Spring2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=26362842&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 26362842
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        0739098X
        TE5
      jtl: International Journal of Applied Philosophy
      issn: 0739098X
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Spring2007
      vid: 21
      iid: 1
      pid: 2411
      pub: Philosophy Documentation Center
    artinfo:
      ui: 26362842
      ppf: 109
      ppct: 7
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Canine Minds, Human Minds.
      aug:
        au: Duran, Jane
        affil: University of California at Santa Barbara
      su:
        Dog behavior
        Animal cognition
        Sheldrake, Rupert, 1942-
        Extrasensory perception in animals
        Animal models of human behavior
      sug:
        subj:
          Dog behavior
          Animal cognition
          Sheldrake, Rupert, 1942-
          Extrasensory perception in animals
          Animal models of human behavior
      ab: Sheldrake's work on canine cognition is examined from more than one standpoint. His use of the terms "social field" and "morphic field" is delineated, and in addition recent work on ethology and cognition, done by Allen and Bekoff, is set out and contrasted with Sheldrake's theorizing. The importance of the allusion to a number of comparatively unexamined concepts, including some borrowed from research on extrasensory perception, is analyzed and it is concluded that Sheldrake has yet to establish his case in acceptable terms.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2007
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N