A Textual Problem at Tacitus Annals 2.88.1.

The article presents a textual criticism of the Roman historian Tacitus and his book "Annals." The author focuses on the Latin phrase "acta senatus" and argues that the justification for the common interpretation of the phrase is not historically sound. The author suggests that the manuscripts upon...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Mnemosyne Vol. 60; no. 4; pp. 651 - 662
Autor principal: DeRousse, Peter
Formato: Literary Criticism
Publicado: Brill Academic Publishers 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=27096784&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 27096784
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00267074
        MNM
      jtl: Mnemosyne
      issn: 00267074
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: 2007
      vid: 60
      iid: 4
      pid: 639
      pub: Brill Academic Publishers
    artinfo:
      ui:
        27096784
        10.1163/156852507X169672
      ppf: 651
      ppct: 11
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
            size: 327KB
      tig:
        atl: A Textual Problem at Tacitus Annals 2.88.1.
      aug:
        au: DeRousse, Peter
        affil: DePaul University, Department of Modern Languages, 802 West Belden Avenue, Chicago, IL 60614, USA
      su:
        Annals (Book : Tacitus)
        Tacitus, Cornelius, 56-117
        Textual criticism
        Latin language education
        Latin manuscripts
      sug:
        subj:
          Annals (Book : Tacitus)
          Tacitus, Cornelius, 56-117
          Textual criticism
          Latin language education
          Latin manuscripts
      ab: The article presents a textual criticism of the Roman historian Tacitus and his book "Annals." The author focuses on the Latin phrase "acta senatus" and argues that the justification for the common interpretation of the phrase is not historically sound. The author suggests that the manuscripts upon which these interpretations are based is not in line with what is known to have been authentically written by Tacitus.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Literary Criticism
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of Mnemosyne is the property of Brill Academic Publishers and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: Mnemosyne
      holder: Brill Academic Publishers
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2007
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N