Discussion of "Four Case Studies on Chance in Evolution": Philosophical Themes and Questions.
The four case studies on chance in evolution provide a rich source for further philosophical analysis. Among the issues raised are the following: Are there different conceptions of chance at work, or is there a common underlying conception? How can a given concept of chance be distinguished from oth...
| Publicado en: | Philosophy of Science Vol. 73; no. 5; pp. 678 - 688 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Cambridge University Press
Dec2006
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=27159503&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 27159503 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 00318248 PSC jtl: Philosophy of Science issn: 00318248 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Dec2006 vid: 73 iid: 5 pid: 15979 pub: Cambridge University Press artinfo: ui: 27159503 10.1086/518522 ppf: 678 ppct: 10 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P size: 2.6MB tig: atl: Discussion of "Four Case Studies on Chance in Evolution": Philosophical Themes and Questions. aug: au: Millstein, Roberta L. affil: Department of Philosophy, University of California, Davis, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616 su: Serendipity in science Evolutionary theories Beatty, John Richardson, Robert Skipper, Robert Dietrich, Michael Gene frequency sug: subj: Serendipity in science Evolutionary theories Beatty, John Richardson, Robert Skipper, Robert Dietrich, Michael Gene frequency ab: The four case studies on chance in evolution provide a rich source for further philosophical analysis. Among the issues raised are the following: Are there different conceptions of chance at work, or is there a common underlying conception? How can a given concept of chance be distinguished from other chance concepts and from nonchance concepts? How can the occurrence of a given chance process be distinguished empirically from nonchance processes or other chance processes? What role does chance play in evolutionary theory? I argue that in order to answer these questions, a careful distinction between process and outcome must be made; however, the purpose of this essay is not to answer these questions definitively, but rather to elaborate on them and to provide a starting point for further discussion. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Copyright of Philosophy of Science is the property of Cambridge University Press and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. item: Philosophy of Science holder: Cambridge University Press dt: @attributes: year: 2006 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|