NIHILIZMAS IR PRASMĖS PROBLEMA: E. LEVINAS.

In the article, attempt is made to reveal the relation between Emmanuel Levinas' thinking and nihilism. Levinas belongs to the epoch, which, from the Western perspective, can be called nihilistic par excellence. What is the relation of Levinas' thought to nihilism then? Can the great challenge of Le...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Problems / Problemos Vol. 71; pp. 141 - 148
Autor principal: Šerpytytė, Rita
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Vilnius University 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=27520694&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 27520694
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        13921126
        3D4C
      jtl: Problems / Problemos
      issn: 13921126
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: 2007
      vid: 71
      pid: 16037
      pub: Vilnius University
    artinfo:
      ui:
        27520694
        10.15388/Problemos.2007..2530
      ppf: 141
      ppct: 7
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
            size: 183KB
      tig:
        atl: NIHILIZMAS IR PRASMĖS PROBLEMA: E. LEVINAS.
      aug:
        au: Šerpytytė, Rita
        affil: Vilniaus universiteto, Religijos studijų ir tyrimų centras, Universiteto g. 9/1, LT-01513 Vilnius
      su:
        Nihilism (Philosophy)
        Lévinas, Emmanuel, 1906-1995
        Philosophy
        Philosophers
        Ontology
        Self-perception
        Political attitudes
      sug:
        subj:
          Nihilism (Philosophy)
          Lévinas, Emmanuel, 1906-1995
          Philosophy
          Philosophers
          Ontology
          Self-perception
          Political attitudes
      keyword:
        Überwindung
        Being
        différance
        nihilism
        Western thought
        Überwindung
        Būtis
        différance
        nihilizmas
        Vakarų mąstymas
      ab:
        In the article, attempt is made to reveal the relation between Emmanuel Levinas' thinking and nihilism. Levinas belongs to the epoch, which, from the Western perspective, can be called nihilistic par excellence. What is the relation of Levinas' thought to nihilism then? Can the great challenge of Levinas to Western philosophy be interpreted as a challenge to (its) nihilism? Levinas, like Heidegger, does not regard nihilism as an "event" that concerns just the spirit -- morality, religion, politics and so on -- of a certain epoch, but assigns it to the thought itself as the thought of Being. Thus the topos of nihilism for Levinas is the very same "sphere" of spirit and Being identified already by the Western thought. Is it possible, however, to say that Levinas' attitude to the phenomenon of nihilism coincides with the actual self-consciousness of nihilism in Western philosophy? Although in Western philosophy we may notice different models of nihilism, the understanding of nihilism as the theory of Überwindung (transgression, overcoming) is highly important for the Western thought, its identity, and its self-consciousness. In Levinas' point of view, the Western thought, based on the nihilistic "logic", by itself is the thinking from the perspective of totality. The requirement of overcoming nihilism is based on the nihilistic "logic" as well. Levinas' philosophy requires not the overcoming of nihilism, but "escaping" from one's own thinking based on such logic. Thinking "based on" the "logic" of nihilism is the totalizing thinking of Being. Therefore, escaping for Levinas means the "escaping" from the "strangling noose of Being" and the "desolation" of the level of Being. Does Levinas succeed in accomplishing what Western metaphysics has never accomplished, i.e. in performing the movement of overcoming and transgression of nihilism? Levinas applies the same conceptions of metaphysics and trans-cendent that gives sense to the nihilistic experience of Western metaphysics, although he maintains them against the nihilistic "logic" of Western thinking itself. The break (demolition) of totality appears for Levinas not in the plane of pure thinking. The meaning cannot be "regained" as something that, according to nihilistic "self-consciousness" of Western ontology, was lost. Otherwise than Being, it can be detected as the Other. Therefore Levinasian thinking of the Other as other is not the accomplishment of nihilistic Überwindung: it is a thinking that establishes itself as escaping from the requirement controlled by the nostalgia of the same One.
        Straipsnyje svarstoma Emmanuelio Levino mąstymo įrašymo į nihilizmo kontekstą galimybė. Levinas priklauso tai epochai, kuri, žvelgiant iš vakarietiškos perspektyvos, gali būti įvardyta nihilistine „par excellence". Tad koks yra Levino mąstymo santykis su nihilizmu? Ar didysis Levino iššūkis Vakarų filosofijai nėra iššūkis prieš jos nihilizmą? Levinui, kaip ir Heideggeriui, nihilizmas yra „įvykis", paliečiantis ne tik tam tikros epochos dvasią -- moralę, religiją, politiką ir t. t., bet ir priskirtinas pačiam mąstymui kaip būties mąstymui. Tad nihilizmo „topos" Levinui yra ta pati jau Vakarų mąstymo identifikuota dvasios ir būties „sfera". Bet ar galima sakyti, kad Levino požiūris į nihilizmo fenomeną yra sutampantis su pačios Vakarų filosofijos nihilizmo savimone? Nors Vakarų filosofijoje įmanu įžvelgti ne vieną nihilizmo modelį, Vakarų mąstymui, pačiai jo tapatybei bei jos savivokai ypač svarbus yra nihilizmas, suprantamas kaip Überwindung (peržengimo, įveikos) teorija. Straipsnyje atskleidžiama, kad Levino filosofija reikalauja ne įveikti nihilizmą, o „pabėgti" iš paties tokia „logika" grindžiamo mąstymo. Mąstymas, kurį „grindžia" nihilizmo „logika", yra totalizuojantis būties mąstymas. Tad Levinui pabėgimas reiškia „pabėgimą" „iš smaugiančios būties kilpos", būties plotmės „apleidimą". Ar Levinui pavyksta įvykdyti tai, ko nėra pavykę visai Vakarų metafizikai -- atlikti (nihilizmo) įveikos, peržengimo judesį? Levinas vartoja tas pačias Vakarų metafizikos nihilistinę patirtį įprasminančias meta-fizikos, transcendento sąvokas, bet nukreipia jas prieš pačią nihilistinę Vakarų mąstymo „logiką". Totalybės nuotrūkis (suardymas) Levinui įvyksta ne grynojo mąstymo plotmėje. Prasmė nėra „atgaunama" kaip tai, ką Vakarų ontologijos nihilistinė „savimonė" laikė esant prarasta. Ji aptinkama kitaip nei būtis -- kaip Kitas. Tad leviniškasis Kito kaip kito mąstymas nėra įvykęs nihilizmo Überwindung: tai mąstymas, kuris steigiasi kaip pabėgimas iš paties tokio Vienio nostalgijos valdomo reikalavimo.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: Lithuanian
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of Problems / Problemos is the property of Vilnius University and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: Problems / Problemos
      holder: Vilnius University
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2007
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N