PATYRIMO TERITORIJA.

The author presents a hypothesis that experience is possible and even somehow inevitable exclusively in the area of direct sensuality. Man, as this particular body individuum, is fatally related to this area as he comes into direct contact with this particular thing that discloses its ineradicable n...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Problems / Problemos Vol. 71; pp. 9 - 24
Autor principal: Šliogeris, Arvydas
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Vilnius University 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=27520710&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 27520710
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        13921126
        3D4C
      jtl: Problems / Problemos
      issn: 13921126
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: 2007
      vid: 71
      pid: 16037
      pub: Vilnius University
    artinfo:
      ui:
        27520710
        10.15388/Problemos.2007..2542
      ppf: 9
      ppct: 15
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
            size: 201KB
      tig:
        atl: PATYRIMO TERITORIJA.
      aug:
        au: Šliogeris, Arvydas
        affil: Vilniaus universiteto, Filosofijos katedra, Universiteto g. 9/1, LT-01513 Vilnius
      su:
        Philosophical anthropology
        Senses
        Human beings
        Experience
        Transcendentalism (Philosophy)
        Philosophy
      sug:
        subj:
          Philosophical anthropology
          Senses
          Human beings
          Experience
          Transcendentalism (Philosophy)
          Philosophy
      keyword:
        experience
        horizon
        individuum
        instrumental relation
        sensual transcendence
        horizontas
        individas
        instrumentinis santykis
        juslinė transcendencija
        patyrimas
      ab:
        The author presents a hypothesis that experience is possible and even somehow inevitable exclusively in the area of direct sensuality. Man, as this particular body individuum, is fatally related to this area as he comes into direct contact with this particular thing that discloses its ineradicable non-humanity. Experience can be defined as a paralinguistic clash with absolute non-humanity which is rooted on this side of the sensual horizon and emerges in the form of a thing as a phenomenon of sensual transcendentality. Therefore, experience should be treated as a total opposite of instrumental relation with a thing. As experience cannot be produced or otherwise 'made', thus the conception of artificial (laboratorical) experience, which takes its origins from Kant and is rooted in techno-science, schould be discarded as an examplary model of any kind of experience. A specific area of experience should not be considered as a laboratory, a factory (or any of its prototypes such as church, workshop, monastery cell, library), a computer screen, or any other kind of 'reality show' but rather as mute things or ensembles of such things untouched by the human hand.
        Straipsnyje keliama hipotezė, kad patyrimas įmanomas ir savaip neišvengiamas tik tiesioginio juslumo teritorijoje, prie kurios fatališkai pririštas žmogus kaip štai šitas kūniškas individas, įeinantis į tiesioginį sąlyti su štai šituo daiktu, patyrimo akimirką atveriančiu savo nepašalinamą nežmogiškumą. Trumpas patyrimo apibūdinimas gali būti toks: tai bekalbė štai šito individo sandūra su absoliučiu nežmogiškumu, įsišaknijusiu vietovėje šiapus juslinio horizonto ir pasirodančiu daikto, kaip juslinės transcendencijos fenomeno, pavidalu. Taigi patyrimą reikia traktuoti kaip visišką instrumentinio santykio su daiktu priešybę. Tai reiškia, kad patyrimas negali būti pagaminamas ar kaip nors „padaromas", todėl nuo Kanto laikų vyraujanti ir technomoksle įsitvirtinusi dirbtinio (laboratorinio) patyrimo, kaip pavyzdinio bet kokio patyrimo modelio, samprata turi būti atmesta. Pavyzdinė patyrimo teritorija yra ne laboratorija, fabrikas (ar jo prototipas -- bažnyčia, dirbtuvė, vienuolyno celė, biblioteka), kompiuterio ekranas ar bet kokios rūšies „reality show", o žmogaus rankų nepalytėti bekalbiai daiktai ir tokių daiktų ansambliai.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: Lithuanian
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of Problems / Problemos is the property of Vilnius University and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: Problems / Problemos
      holder: Vilnius University
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2007
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N