The Digitized Self as Public Tender: Conceptualizing Informational Privacy at the Intersection of Information Technology, Commerce, and Public Policy.
This article identifies the key issues and interests influencing the informational privacy debate, namely, new information technologies, the mass media, the identity industry, and lawmakers. It argues that new information technologies undermine informational privacy by facilitating personal record (...
| Publicado en: | Atlantic Journal of Communication Vol. 15; no. 4; pp. 231 - 249 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis Ltd
2007
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=27622573&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 27622573 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 15456870 U8J jtl: Atlantic Journal of Communication issn: 15456870 maglogo: Y pubinfo: dt: 2007 vid: 15 iid: 4 pid: 377 pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd artinfo: ui: 27622573 10.1080/15456870701465281 ppf: 231 ppct: 18 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P size: 157KB tig: atl: The Digitized Self as Public Tender: Conceptualizing Informational Privacy at the Intersection of Information Technology, Commerce, and Public Policy. aug: au: Bah, Umaru affil: Department of Communication Studies, Morgan State University su: Right of privacy Personal information management Confidential records Television broadcasting of news Mass media High technology Legislators Identity theft Political planning United States sug: subj: United States Right of privacy Personal information management Confidential records Television broadcasting of news Mass media High technology Legislators Identity theft Political planning ab: This article identifies the key issues and interests influencing the informational privacy debate, namely, new information technologies, the mass media, the identity industry, and lawmakers. It argues that new information technologies undermine informational privacy by facilitating personal record (mis)management and (ab)use, that sensational coverage by the media of identity theft, data breach, or record misplacement promotes, even if inadvertently, more the interests of commercial data brokers than those of consumers. The article also asserts that although the identity industry, consumer privacy advocates, and federal lawmakers all share a genuine desire to provide greater protections to individuals' personal records, they differ on the nature and scope of such protection because of their contrasting perceptions of informational privacy. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Copyright of Atlantic Journal of Communication is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. item: Atlantic Journal of Communication holder: Taylor & Francis Ltd dt: @attributes: year: 2007 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|