VAIZDUOTIŠKA SĄMONĖ.
The question of time is rarely taken into account while discussing imagination. Phantasy elements are usally analysed and treated as stagnating pictures which do not belong to the chronological flow. This happens, namely because of a frequent intention, also in the philosophical discussion to genera...
| Publicado en: | Problems / Problemos Vol. 72; pp. 124 - 135 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Vilnius University
2007
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=27654681&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 27654681 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 13921126 3D4C jtl: Problems / Problemos issn: 13921126 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: 2007 vid: 72 pid: 16037 pub: Vilnius University artinfo: ui: 27654681 10.15388/Problemos.2007.0.2036 ppf: 124 ppct: 11 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P size: 224KB tig: atl: VAIZDUOTIŠKA SĄMONĖ. aug: au: Sabolius, Kristupas affil: Vilniaus universiteto Filosofijos katedra, Universiteto g. 9/1, LT-01513 Vilnius su: Time Fantasy (Psychology) Chronology Imagination Subjectivity Illusion (Philosophy) sug: subj: Time Fantasy (Psychology) Chronology Imagination Subjectivity Illusion (Philosophy) keyword: consciousness ego imaginary imagination phantasy įsivaizdavimas ego fantazija sąmonė vaizduotė ab: The question of time is rarely taken into account while discussing imagination. Phantasy elements are usally analysed and treated as stagnating pictures which do not belong to the chronological flow. This happens, namely because of a frequent intention, also in the philosophical discussion to generalize phantasy defining it as "the unreal of consciousness". This artice, based on the method of phenomenological description, reveals the temporal structure of imagination in action. The latter leads to the greater paradox: the imaginary doesn't coincide with the egological centre of transcendental subjectivity but is experienced as an uncontrolled poweful function, the Ego prevailing over Otherness whose autonomous character is hidden behind the illusion of the predominating reflective consciousness. Analizuojant vaizduotę laiko klausimas retokai patenka į akiratį. Fantazijos elementai dažniausiai nagrinėjami tarsi anapus laiko pakibusios sustabdyto laiko fotografijos. Taip nutinka todėl, kad net ir filosofiniuose svarstymuose linkstama vaizduotę apibendrinti su „sąmonės netikrovės" rubrika. Straipsnyje, remiantis fenomenologiniu aprašymo metodu, aptinkama laikiška vaizduotės veikimo struktūra, taip pat atskleidžiamas dar didesnis įsivaizdavimo paradoksas. Fantazija nesutampa su transcendentalinio subjetyvumo egologiniu centru, bet dažnai patiriama kaip nepavaldi galinga funkcija, kuri yra ego pranokstanti kitybė, kažkas Kita, kas elgiasi savavališkai ir sukuria reflektyvios sąmonės dominavimo iliuziją. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: Lithuanian refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Copyright of Problems / Problemos is the property of Vilnius University and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. item: Problems / Problemos holder: Vilnius University dt: @attributes: year: 2007 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|