A defence of informational structural realism.

Abstract  This is the revised version of an invited keynote lecture delivered at the 1st Australian Computing and Philosophy Conference (CAP@AU; the Australian National University in Canberra, 31 October–2 November, 2003). The paper is divided into two parts. The first part defends an informational...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Synthese Vol. 161; no. 2; pp. 219 - 254
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Springer Nature Mar2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=29318206&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 29318206
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00397857
        4LI
      jtl: Synthese
      issn: 00397857
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Mar2008
      vid: 161
      iid: 2
      pid: 237
      pub: Springer Nature
    artinfo:
      ui:
        29318206
        10.1007/s11229-007-9163-z
      ppf: 219
      ppct: 35
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
            size: 503KB
      tig:
        atl: A defence of informational structural realism.
      aug:
      su:
        Realism
        Empiricism
        Philosophy
        Universals (Philosophy)
      sug:
        subj:
          Realism
          Empiricism
          Philosophy
          Universals (Philosophy)
      ab: Abstract  This is the revised version of an invited keynote lecture delivered at the 1st Australian Computing and Philosophy Conference (CAP@AU; the Australian National University in Canberra, 31 October–2 November, 2003). The paper is divided into two parts. The first part defends an informational approach to structural realism. It does so in three steps. First, it is shown that, within the debate about structural realism (SR), epistemic (ESR) and ontic (OSR) structural realism are reconcilable. It follows that a version of OSR is defensible from a structuralist-friendly position. Second, it is argued that a version of OSR is also plausible, because not all relata (structured entities) are logically prior to relations (structures). Third, it is shown that a version of OSR is also applicable to both sub-observable (unobservable and instrumentally-only observable) and observable entities, by developing its ontology of structural objects in terms of informational objects. The outcome is informational structural realism, a version of OSR supporting the ontological commitment to a view of the world as the totality of informational objects dynamically interacting with each other. The paper has been discussed by several colleagues and, in the second half, ten objections that have been moved to the proposal are answered in order to clarify it further.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Synthese is a copyright of Springer, 2008. All Rights Reserved.
      item: Synthese
      holder: Springer Nature
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2008
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N