A user's guide to design arguments.

The article focuses on the conflict between fine-tuning and biological design arguments in the philosophical perspectives of theism and creationism. A description is given contrasting the interaction of an "unknown probability" with both systems and various conclusions are offered regarding the mutu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Religious Studies Vol. 44; no. 1; pp. 99 - 111
Autores principales: Dougherty, Trent, Poston, Ted
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Cambridge University Press Mar2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=29365880&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 29365880
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00344125
        RGS
      jtl: Religious Studies
      issn: 00344125
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Mar2008
      vid: 44
      iid: 1
      pid: 15979
      pub: Cambridge University Press
    artinfo:
      ui:
        29365880
        10.1017/S003441250700933X
      ppf: 99
      ppct: 12
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: A user's guide to design arguments.
      aug:
        au:
          Dougherty, Trent
          Poston, Ted
        affil:
          Department of Philosophy, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY 14627
          Department of Philosophy, University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL 36688
      su:
        Creationism
        Proof of God
        Theism
        Complexity (Philosophy)
        Biocomplexity
        Philosophy of religion
      sug:
        subj:
          Creationism
          Proof of God
          Theism
          Complexity (Philosophy)
          Biocomplexity
          Philosophy of religion
      ab: The article focuses on the conflict between fine-tuning and biological design arguments in the philosophical perspectives of theism and creationism. A description is given contrasting the interaction of an "unknown probability" with both systems and various conclusions are offered regarding the mutual exclusivity of both arguments and the impact of self-organizing systems of theism.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2008
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N