Exploitation of American Indian Symbols: A First Amendment Analysis.
This article discusses the controversy regarding the use of American Indian symbols. Arguments are offered by critics and defenders of symbol use and whether the custom of symbols should be regulated under the U.S. Constitution's First Amendment doctrines is explored. A First Amendment analysis is o...
| Publicado en: | American Indian Quarterly Vol. 32; no. 2; pp. 121 - 141 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
University of Nebraska Press
Spring2008
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=31187076&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 31187076 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 0095182X AIQ jtl: American Indian Quarterly issn: 0095182X maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Spring2008 vid: 32 iid: 2 pid: 758 pub: University of Nebraska Press artinfo: ui: 31187076 10.1353/aiq.2008.0017 ppf: 121 ppct: 20 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P size: 102KB tig: atl: Exploitation of American Indian Symbols: A First Amendment Analysis. aug: au: Hemmer, Jr., Joseph J. affil: Carroll College, Waukesha, Wisconsin su: Signs & symbols Actions & defenses (Law) Exploitation of humans Trials (Law) United States. Constitution. 1st Amendment Native Americans United States sug: subj: United States Signs & symbols Actions & defenses (Law) Exploitation of humans Trials (Law) United States. Constitution. 1st Amendment Native Americans ab: This article discusses the controversy regarding the use of American Indian symbols. Arguments are offered by critics and defenders of symbol use and whether the custom of symbols should be regulated under the U.S. Constitution's First Amendment doctrines is explored. A First Amendment analysis is offered which includes the established doctrines for offensive words, fighting words, hate speech, group libel, significant governmental interest and commercial speech. Several U.S. Supreme court cases illustrating the doctrines are discussed including the case Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire, R.A.V. v. St. Paul, Minnesota, Beauharnais v. Illinois, United States v. O'Brien and Central Hudson Gas and Electric Corporation v. Public Service Commission of New York. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Copyright of American Indian Quarterly is the property of University of Nebraska Press and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. item: American Indian Quarterly holder: University of Nebraska Press dt: @attributes: year: 2008 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|