COHERENCE AND AMBIGUITY IN HISTORY.

abstract This article is about the logic of the concept of "coherence" as used by historians to justify an argument. Despite its effectiveness in historical arguments, coherence is problematic for epistemologists and some theorists of history. The main purpose of this article is to present some insi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:History & Theory Vol. 39; no. 2; pp. 167 - 181
Autor principal: Pollmann, Thijs
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell May2000
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=3167241&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 3167241
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00182656
        HAT
      jtl: History & Theory
      issn: 00182656
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: May2000
      vid: 39
      iid: 2
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
    artinfo:
      ui:
        3167241
        10.1111/0018-2656.00121
      ppf: 167
      ppct: 14
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 1.3MB
      tig:
        atl: COHERENCE AND AMBIGUITY IN HISTORY.
      aug:
        au: Pollmann, Thijs
      su:
        Cohesion (Linguistics)
        History
        Discourse analysis
      sug:
        subj:
          Cohesion (Linguistics)
          History
          Discourse analysis
      ab: abstract This article is about the logic of the concept of "coherence" as used by historians to justify an argument. Despite its effectiveness in historical arguments, coherence is problematic for epistemologists and some theorists of history. The main purpose of this article is to present some insights that bear upon the logical status of coherence. As will be demonstrated, this will also shed some light on the allegedly dubious epistemological position of coherence. In general I will argue that, logically seen, coherence is a property of a set of related beliefs that makes it possible m justify a choice out of different factually justifiable interpretations. Coherence disambiguates vague or ambiguous observations. As words lose their vagueness or ambiguity in contexts, so do contexts disambiguate historical facts. My argument will be based on some relatively recent findings about the cognitive processes underlying vision and reading. Research in the field of text linguistics is used to show what kinds of relationships exist between historical representations that might be considered to cohere.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of History & Theory is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: History & Theory
      holder: Wiley-Blackwell
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2000
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N