A Critique of Positive Responsibility in Computing.

It has been claimed that (1) computer professionals should be held responsible for an undisclosed list of “undesirable events” associated with their work and (2) most if not all computer disasters can be avoided by truly understanding responsibility. Programmers, software developers, and other compu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Science & Engineering Ethics Vol. 14; no. 2; pp. 219 - 234
Autor principal: Stieb, James A.
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Springer Nature Jun2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=32154915&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 32154915
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        13533452
        GNI
      jtl: Science & Engineering Ethics
      issn: 13533452
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Jun2008
      vid: 14
      iid: 2
      pid: 237
      pub: Springer Nature
    artinfo:
      ui:
        32154915
        10.1007/s11948-008-9067-4
      ppf: 219
      ppct: 15
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
            size: 171KB
      tig:
        atl: A Critique of Positive Responsibility in Computing.
      aug:
        au: Stieb, James A.
        affil: Department of English, Drexel University, 5th Floor MacAlister Hall, 3141 Chestnut Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
      su:
        Computer ethics
        Altruism
        Software engineering
        Computer software developers
        Computer programmers
      sug:
        subj:
          Computer ethics
          Altruism
          Software engineering
          Computer software developers
          Computer programmers
      keyword:
        Responsibility
        Self-interest
      ab: It has been claimed that (1) computer professionals should be held responsible for an undisclosed list of “undesirable events” associated with their work and (2) most if not all computer disasters can be avoided by truly understanding responsibility. Programmers, software developers, and other computer professionals should be defended against such vague, counterproductive, and impossible ideals because these imply the mandatory satisfaction of social needs and the equation of ethics with a kind of altruism. The concept of social needs is debatable with no one possessing the authority to impose their version of them. Similarly, the notion of “positive responsibility” is difficult to apply, does not effectively change computing practice, and confuses good (i.e., efficient) computer engineering with good (i.e. moral) computer engineering.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Science & Engineering Ethics is a copyright of Springer, 2008. All Rights Reserved.
      item: Science & Engineering Ethics
      holder: Springer Nature
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2008
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N