“‘Once more unto the Breach’: Professional Responsibility and Computer Ethics”.

The author discusses a paper by James Stieb which criticizes his work on professional responsibility in computing. He claims that he finds it hard to comment on Stieb's paper because many of the positions attacked by Stieb were not from him. The author points out the weakness of the move of Stieb to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Science & Engineering Ethics Vol. 14; no. 2; pp. 235 - 240
Autor principal: Gotterbarn, Don
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Springer Nature Jun2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=32154925&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 32154925
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        13533452
        GNI
      jtl: Science & Engineering Ethics
      issn: 13533452
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Jun2008
      vid: 14
      iid: 2
      pid: 237
      pub: Springer Nature
    artinfo:
      ui:
        32154925
        10.1007/s11948-008-9071-8
      ppf: 235
      ppct: 5
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
            size: 118KB
      tig:
        atl: “‘Once more unto the Breach’: Professional Responsibility and Computer Ethics”.
      aug:
        au: Gotterbarn, Don
        affil: Software Engineering Ethics Research Institute, Computer and Information Sciences, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, TN 37614-1266, USA
      su:
        Editorials
        Computer ethics
        Professional ethics
        Stieb, James
        Computer Ethics & Professional Responsibility (Book)
      sug:
        subj:
          Editorials
          Computer ethics
          Professional ethics
          Stieb, James
          Computer Ethics & Professional Responsibility (Book)
      ab: The author discusses a paper by James Stieb which criticizes his work on professional responsibility in computing. He claims that he finds it hard to comment on Stieb's paper because many of the positions attacked by Stieb were not from him. The author points out the weakness of the move of Stieb to use guilt by association to prove that he supports a checklist approach to computer ethics. He adds that Stieb is being unreasonable for claiming that the book "Computer Ethics and Professional Responsibility" advocates the checklist approach.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Science & Engineering Ethics is a copyright of Springer, 2008. All Rights Reserved.
      item: Science & Engineering Ethics
      holder: Springer Nature
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2008
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N