CIPHERS OF TRANSCENDENCE: COGNITIVE AESTHETICS IN SCIENCE.

Modern epistemology is reluctant to presume the objectivity of a mental event. Because a valid theory of knowledge is subjected to objective standards of rationality, the invocation of a transcendent ground of existence termed ‘god’ is deemed extra-systematic. This reference lacks warrant because it...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Heythrop Journal Vol. 49; no. 4; pp. 603 - 620
Main Author: HUNT, ANDREW N.
Format: Article
Published: Wiley-Blackwell Jul2008
Subjects:
Online Access:View this record in EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=32624741&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 32624741
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00181196
        D84
      jtl: Heythrop Journal
      issn: 00181196
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Jul2008
      vid: 49
      iid: 4
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
    artinfo:
      ui:
        32624741
        10.1111/j.1468-2265.2008.00397.x
      ppf: 603
      ppct: 17
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 174KB
      tig:
        atl: CIPHERS OF TRANSCENDENCE: COGNITIVE AESTHETICS IN SCIENCE.
      aug:
        au: HUNT, ANDREW N.
        affil: The University of Liverpool, UK
      su:
        Religion & science
        Jaspers, Karl, 1883-1969
        Aesthetics
        Theology
        Transcendence of God
        Theory of knowledge
      sug:
        subj:
          Religion & science
          Jaspers, Karl, 1883-1969
          Aesthetics
          Theology
          Transcendence of God
          Theory of knowledge
      ab: Modern epistemology is reluctant to presume the objectivity of a mental event. Because a valid theory of knowledge is subjected to objective standards of rationality, the invocation of a transcendent ground of existence termed ‘god’ is deemed extra-systematic. This reference lacks warrant because it fails to satisfy the impartial criteria methodologically basic to contemporary paradigms of knowledge. Still the biochemist Arthur Peacocke (1924–2006) claimed defensible public truth for an ultimate reality based on the ‘supremely’ rational nature of existence; it is the further contention of this paper that there are intelligible patterns to the universe whose discovery is incapable of ‘objective’ explanation. By failing to meet these criteria, however, they do not fall into irrationality, still less do they disqualify or exclude themselves from public consideration; quite the opposite. There are perhaps depths to human experience then, including science, to which an existentialist epistemology is appropriate. In this connection the philosophy of Karl Jaspers (1883–1969) provides a compelling account of the transition of scientific research into aesthetics and theological discourse.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of Heythrop Journal is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: Heythrop Journal
      holder: Wiley-Blackwell
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2008
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N