Dislodging "Embedded" Religion: A Brief Note on a Scholarly Trope.

Scholars of ancient cultures are increasingly speaking of the "embeddedness" of ancient religion — arguing that the practices modern investigators group under the heading of "religion" did not compose a well-defined category in antiquity; instead, they claim that "religion was embedded" in other asp...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Numen: International Review for the History of Religions Vol. 55; no. 4; pp. 440 - 461
Main Author: Nongbri, Brent
Format: Article
Published: Brill Academic Publishers 2008
Subjects:
Online Access:View this record in EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=32661461&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 32661461
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00295973
        C4J
      jtl: Numen: International Review for the History of Religions
      issn: 00295973
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: 2008
      vid: 55
      iid: 4
      pid: 639
      pub: Brill Academic Publishers
    artinfo:
      ui:
        32661461
        10.1163/156852708X310527
      ppf: 440
      ppct: 21
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
            size: 159KB
      tig:
        atl: Dislodging "Embedded" Religion: A Brief Note on a Scholarly Trope.
      aug:
        au: Nongbri, Brent
        affil: Department of Religious Studies, Yale University, 451 College St., P.O. Box 208287, New Haven, CT, USA
      su:
        Roman religion
        Enlightenment
        Religion & culture
        Religion & politics
        Economics
        Religion
      sug:
        subj:
          Roman religion
          Enlightenment
          Religion & culture
          Religion & politics
          Economics
          Religion
      keyword:
        descriptive
        EMBEDDED RELIGION
        REDESCRIPTIVE
      ab: Scholars of ancient cultures are increasingly speaking of the "embeddedness" of ancient religion — arguing that the practices modern investigators group under the heading of "religion" did not compose a well-defined category in antiquity; instead, they claim that "religion was embedded" in other aspects of ancient culture. These writers use this notion of "embeddedness" to help us see that categories post-Enlightenment thinkers often regard as distinct (such as politics, economics, and religion) largely overlapped in antiquity. The trope of "embedded religion" can, however, also produce the false impression that religion is a descriptive concept rather than a redescriptive concept for ancient cultures (i.e., that there really is something "out there" in antiquity called "Roman religion" or "Mesopotamian religion," which scholars are simply describing rather than creating). By allowing this slippage between descriptive and redescriptive uses of "religion," the rhetoric of "embedded religion" exacerbates the very problem it is meant to solve.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of Numen: International Review for the History of Religions is the property of Brill Academic Publishers and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: Numen: International Review for the History of Religions
      holder: Brill Academic Publishers
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2008
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N