Can There Be Stochastic Evolutionary Causes?

Do evolutionary processes such as selection and random drift cause evolutionary change, or are they merely convenient ways of describing or summarizing it? Philosophers have lined up on both sides of this question. One recent defense (Reisman and Forber 2005) of the causal status of selection and dr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Philosophy of Science Vol. 74; no. 5; pp. 616 - 628
Autores principales: Forber, Patrick, Reisman, Kenneth
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Cambridge University Press Dec2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=32869846&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 32869846
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00318248
        PSC
      jtl: Philosophy of Science
      issn: 00318248
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Dec2007
      vid: 74
      iid: 5
      pid: 15979
      pub: Cambridge University Press
    artinfo:
      ui:
        32869846
        10.1086/525608
      ppf: 616
      ppct: 12
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
            size: 130KB
      tig:
        atl: Can There Be Stochastic Evolutionary Causes?
      aug:
        au:
          Forber, Patrick
          Reisman, Kenneth
        affil: Patrick Forber, Tufts University, Philosophy Department, Miner Hall, Medford, MA 02155
      su:
        Causation (Philosophy)
        Natural selection
        Biological evolution
        Philosophy of biology
        Stochastic analysis
      sug:
        subj:
          Causation (Philosophy)
          Natural selection
          Biological evolution
          Philosophy of biology
          Stochastic analysis
      ab: Do evolutionary processes such as selection and random drift cause evolutionary change, or are they merely convenient ways of describing or summarizing it? Philosophers have lined up on both sides of this question. One recent defense (Reisman and Forber 2005) of the causal status of selection and drift appeals to a manipulability theory of causation. Yet, even if one accepts manipulability, there are still reasons to doubt that genetic drift, in particular, is genuinely causal. We will address two challenges to treating drift as causal within a manipulation framework. We will argue that both challenges ultimately fail, but that they raise interesting and subtle issues about the nature of causation and the differences between selection and drift.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of Philosophy of Science is the property of Cambridge University Press and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: Philosophy of Science
      holder: Cambridge University Press
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2007
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N