Factors Influencing Two Types of Congruence in Multirater Judgments.
In two studies of 360 Degrees judgments, it was shown that congruence measured in terms of intercorrelations between ratings by different people (congruence-r) and in terms of the discrepancy between those ratings (congruence-d) were empirically independent of each other. Congruence-r was greatest,...
| Published in: | Human Performance Vol. 12; no. 3/4; pp. 183 - 211 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , |
| Format: | Article |
| Published: |
Taylor & Francis Ltd
1999
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | View this record in EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=3344627&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ssf uiTerm: 3344627 longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson) uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 08959285 7LX jtl: Human Performance issn: 08959285 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: 1999 vid: 12 iid: 3/4 pid: 377 pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd artinfo: ui: 3344627 10.1207/s15327043hup1203&4_1 ppf: 183 ppct: 28 formats: tig: atl: Factors Influencing Two Types of Congruence in Multirater Judgments. aug: au: Warr, Peter Bourne, Alan su: Legal judgments Trait intercorrelations Employee reviews sug: subj: Legal judgments Trait intercorrelations Employee reviews ab: In two studies of 360 Degrees judgments, it was shown that congruence measured in terms of intercorrelations between ratings by different people (congruence-r) and in terms of the discrepancy between those ratings (congruence-d) were empirically independent of each other. Congruence-r was greatest, and congruence-d was smallest, between judgments made by a target person and his or her supervisor, rather than by subordinates or peers; the differential observability of rated behaviors predicted congruence-r but not congruence-d. Variations in both forms of congruence were found to arise from the source of a judgment, and from a target person's age, gender, cognitive ability, and certain personality attributes. Over- and under-rating associated with a personality or another third factor was shown to derive from substantially different correlations between such a factor and the two separate judgments under consideration. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: N holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|