After the Philosophy of Mind: Replacing Scholasticism with Science.
We provide a taxonomy of the two most important debates in the philosophy of the cognitive and neural sciences. The first debate is over methodological individualism: is the object of the cognitive and neural sciences the brain, the whole animal, or the animal--environment system? The second is over...
| Publicado en: | Philosophy of Science Vol. 75; no. 1; pp. 1 - 28 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Cambridge University Press
Jan2008
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=33553815&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 33553815 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 00318248 PSC jtl: Philosophy of Science issn: 00318248 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Jan2008 vid: 75 iid: 1 pid: 15979 pub: Cambridge University Press artinfo: ui: 33553815 10.1086/587820 ppf: 1 ppct: 27 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P size: 209KB tig: atl: After the Philosophy of Mind: Replacing Scholasticism with Science. aug: au: Chemero, Anthony Silberstein, Michael affil: Franklin and Marshall College, Lancaster, PA 17604-3003 Elizabethtown College, One Alpha Drive, Elizabethtown, PA 17022-2298 University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742 su: Philosophy & science Philosophy of science Cognitive science Neurosciences Methodology sug: subj: Philosophy & science Philosophy of science Cognitive science Neurosciences Methodology ab: We provide a taxonomy of the two most important debates in the philosophy of the cognitive and neural sciences. The first debate is over methodological individualism: is the object of the cognitive and neural sciences the brain, the whole animal, or the animal--environment system? The second is over explanatory style: should explanation in cognitive and neural science be reductionist-mechanistic, interlevel mechanistic, or dynamical? After setting out the debates, we discuss the ways in which they are interconnected. Finally, we make some recommendations that we hope will help philosophers interested in the cognitive and neural sciences to avoid dead ends pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Copyright of Philosophy of Science is the property of Cambridge University Press and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. item: Philosophy of Science holder: Cambridge University Press dt: @attributes: year: 2008 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|