Not Even False: A Commentary on Parrish and Toner.
The author comments on two papers about God and Objectivism by Patric Toner and Stephen E. Parrish. Toner misreads several comments by Objectivist scholars about objectivism's direct objection to the concept of a god, thus, responding to Toner requires a systematic exposition of an objective approac...
| Publicado en: | Journal of Ayn Rand Studies (Journal of Ayn Rand Studies Foundation) Vol. 9; no. 2; pp. 361 - 395 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Journal of Ayn Rand Studies Foundation
Spring2008
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=33719057&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 33719057 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 15261018 325B jtl: Journal of Ayn Rand Studies (Journal of Ayn Rand Studies Foundation) issn: 15261018 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Spring2008 vid: 9 iid: 2 pid: 33491 pub: Journal of Ayn Rand Studies Foundation artinfo: ui: 33719057 10.5325/jaynrandstud.9.2.0361 ppf: 361 ppct: 34 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P size: 290KB tig: atl: Not Even False: A Commentary on Parrish and Toner. aug: au: Reed, Adam su: God Objectivism (Philosophy) Reason Philosophy of religion Objectivity Reality Theory of knowledge Philosophy & religion Scholars sug: subj: God Objectivism (Philosophy) Reason Philosophy of religion Objectivity Reality Theory of knowledge Philosophy & religion Scholars ab: The author comments on two papers about God and Objectivism by Patric Toner and Stephen E. Parrish. Toner misreads several comments by Objectivist scholars about objectivism's direct objection to the concept of a god, thus, responding to Toner requires a systematic exposition of an objective approach to the god question. Some arguments of Parrish depend on inserting an element contrary to Objectivism into some Objectivist comment. The author says that it is not legitimate to combine what Objectivism considers a non-concept with Objectivist arguments. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Copyright of Journal of Ayn Rand Studies (Journal of Ayn Rand Studies Foundation) is the property of Journal of Ayn Rand Studies Foundation and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. item: Journal of Ayn Rand Studies (Journal of Ayn Rand Studies Foundation) holder: Journal of Ayn Rand Studies Foundation dt: @attributes: year: 2008 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|