Temperature Independence of the Photoinduced Electron Injection in Dye-Sensitized TiO Rationalized by Ab lnitio Time-Domain Density Functional Theory.

Time-domain density functional theory simulations resolve the apparent conflict between the central role that thermal fluctuations play in the photoinduced chromophore—TiO electron transfer (ET) in dye-sensitized semiconductor solar cells [J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 18234; Isr. J. Chem. 2003, 42,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Journal of the American Chemical Society Vol. 130; no. 30; pp. 9756 - 9763
Autores principales: Duncan, Walter R., Prezhdo, Oleg V.
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: American Chemical Society 7/30/2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
Descripción
Sumario:Time-domain density functional theory simulations resolve the apparent conflict between the central role that thermal fluctuations play in the photoinduced chromophore—TiO electron transfer (ET) in dye-sensitized semiconductor solar cells [J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 18234; Isr. J. Chem. 2003, 42, 213] and the temperature independence of the El rate [e.g., Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 2005, 56, 119]. The study, performed on the alizarin—TiO interface at a range of temperatures, demonstrates that the El dynamics, both adiabatic and nonadiabatic (NA), are dependent on the temperature, but only slightly. The adiabatic rate increases with temperature because a fluctuation toward a transition state (TS) becomes more likely. A classical TS theory analysis of the adiabatic El gives a Gibbs energy of activation that is equal to kT at approximately 50 K, and a prefactor that corresponds to multiple El pathways. Ihe NA rate increases as a result of changes in the distribution of photoexcited-state energies and, hence, in the density of accessible TiO levels, as expressed in the Fermi Golden Rule. In the system under investigation, the photoexcited state lies close to the bottom of the TiO conduction band (08), and the chromophore—semiconductor coupling is strong, resulting in primarily adiabatic ET. By extrapolating the simulation results to chromophores with excited states deeper inside the CB and weaker donor—acceptor coupling, we conclude that the interfacial El is essentially independent of temperature, even though thermal ionic motions create a widespread of initial conditions, determine the distribution of injected electron energy, and drive both adiabatic and NA ET.