Serving Three Masters: The Cultural Gatekeeper's Dilemma.
The author studies the role of cultural gatekeepers in presenting art to the public and the triple responsibilities they bear: to the artist, audience, and investors. How can these three often competing interests be balanced? Conclusions are drawn from interviews with ten Australian cultural gatekee...
| Publicado en: | Journal of Arts Management, Law & Society Vol. 38; no. 1; pp. 51 - 71 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis Ltd
Spring2008
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=34053303&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 34053303 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 10632921 ARM jtl: Journal of Arts Management, Law & Society issn: 10632921 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Spring2008 vid: 38 iid: 1 pid: 377 pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd artinfo: ui: 34053303 10.3200/JAML.38.1.51-70 ppf: 51 ppct: 20 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P size: 457KB tig: atl: Serving Three Masters: The Cultural Gatekeeper's Dilemma. aug: au: De Roeper, Julia affil: Lecturer, University of South Australia, Member, South Australian Screen Industry Council su: Gatekeepers Australians Performing arts Investors Impetus theory Financial management Management science Art schools Artists sug: subj: Gatekeepers Australians Performing arts Investors Impetus theory Financial management Management science Art schools Artists keyword: arts audience cultural gatekeepers funding investors ab: The author studies the role of cultural gatekeepers in presenting art to the public and the triple responsibilities they bear: to the artist, audience, and investors. How can these three often competing interests be balanced? Conclusions are drawn from interviews with ten Australian cultural gatekeepers working in the performing arts who discussed their programming priorities; these comments are contextualized by statements from eight Australian artists working in various media about the impetus behind their work. The findings of both aspects of the research are considered here for their programming and funding policy implications. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Copyright of Journal of Arts Management, Law & Society is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. item: Journal of Arts Management, Law & Society holder: Taylor & Francis Ltd dt: @attributes: year: 2008 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|