Evaluating brief cognitive impairment screening instruments among African Americans.

This article compared and contrasted the Telephone Interview of Cognitive Status (TICS) to the racially-sensitive Short Portable Mental Status Questionnaire (SPMSQ). The empirical questions addressed was whether the TICS over-represented African American (AA) cognitive impairment (CI) relative to th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Aging & Mental Health Vol. 12; no. 4; pp. 488 - 494
Autores principales: Kiddoe, Jared M., Whitfield, Keith E., Andel, Ross, Edwards, Christopher L.
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Taylor & Francis Ltd Jul2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=34280692&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 34280692
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        13607863
        57E
      jtl: Aging & Mental Health
      issn: 13607863
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Jul2008
      vid: 12
      iid: 4
      pid: 377
      pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd
    artinfo:
      ui:
        34280692
        10.1080/13607860802224383
      ppf: 488
      ppct: 6
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Evaluating brief cognitive impairment screening instruments among African Americans.
      aug:
        au:
          Kiddoe, Jared M.
          Whitfield, Keith E.
          Andel, Ross
          Edwards, Christopher L.
        affil:
          Duke University School of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, Durham, NC, USA
          Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
          School of Aging Studies, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
          Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences/Medical Psychology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27705
      su:
        Intellectual disabilities
        Mental health
        African Americans
        Mental health services
        People with intellectual disabilities
        Cognition disorders
        Learning problems
        Cognitive Abilities Test
        Disease prevalence
      sug:
        subj:
          Intellectual disabilities
          Mental health
          African Americans
          Mental health services
          People with intellectual disabilities
          Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
          Psychiatric and Substance Abuse Hospitals
          Residential Mental Health and Substance Abuse Facilities
          Cognition disorders
          Learning problems
          Cognitive Abilities Test
          Disease prevalence
      keyword:
        Cognitive impairment
        cognitive measures
        Cognitive impairment
        cognitive measures
      ab: This article compared and contrasted the Telephone Interview of Cognitive Status (TICS) to the racially-sensitive Short Portable Mental Status Questionnaire (SPMSQ). The empirical questions addressed was whether the TICS over-represented African American (AA) cognitive impairment (CI) relative to the SPMSQ, if there were age differences in CI prevalence between younger subjects (ages 50-64) and older ones (>64 years) and on accuracy to detect CI in individuals with higher levels of educations (≥13 years) versus those with lower education levels (<13 years). A secondary data analysis was performed on 396 AA participants from the Carolina African American Twin Study on Aging (CAATSA). The SPMSQ measured CI prevalence at 10.3% and the TICS at 45.0%. Within the younger group, TICS and CI prevalence was 49.3 and 80% among the older group. Within the younger group SPMSQ and CI prevalence was 14.5 and 53.8% among the older group. Within the higher educated group, TICS and CI prevalence was 36.7 and 51.4% among the lower educated. Within the higher educated group, SPMSQ and CI prevalence was 7.7 and 14.5% among the lower educated. Findings are consistent with our hypotheses that the TICS would be a less accurate assessor of CI among AAs.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N