Rebuttal: David L. Dill.
The author reflects on voting machines used in U.S. elections, stating that paperless electronic voting machines should be banned from use in elections. The article is a rebuttal to another article found elsewhere in the issue on the topic of direct-recording electronic voting machines (DREs). Topic...
| Publicado en: | Communications of the ACM Vol. 51; no. 10; pp. 32 - 34 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , |
| Formato: | Editorial |
| Publicado: |
Association for Computing Machinery
Oct2008
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| Sumario: | The author reflects on voting machines used in U.S. elections, stating that paperless electronic voting machines should be banned from use in elections. The article is a rebuttal to another article found elsewhere in the issue on the topic of direct-recording electronic voting machines (DREs). Topics include voter-marked ballots, precinct-count optical scan technology (PCOS), and the independent verification of vote tallies. Also discussed is the impossibility of trustworthy elections with DREs. |
|---|