PRIVACY, SEPARATION, AND CONTROL.
The article explores the complexity of the rights of privacy. It is inferred that privacy has a strong agreement with literature because it morally either enhances autonomy and human dignity or because it provides space for the maintenance of one's intimate social relationship. It focuses on the iss...
| Publicado en: | Monist Vol. 91; no. 1; pp. 130 - 151 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Oxford University Press / USA
Jan2008
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=34608921&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 34608921 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 00269662 MST jtl: Monist issn: 00269662 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Jan2008 vid: 91 iid: 1 pid: 622 pub: Oxford University Press / USA artinfo: ui: 34608921 ppf: 130 ppct: 21 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P size: 1.2MB tig: atl: PRIVACY, SEPARATION, AND CONTROL. aug: au: Matthews, Steve affil: Centre for Applied Philosophy and Public Ethics, School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Charles Sturt University, Canberra, Australia su: Right of privacy Theory of knowledge Political autonomy Reductionism Property rights Social interaction Dignity Intellectual freedom Human behavior sug: subj: Right of privacy Theory of knowledge Political autonomy Reductionism Property rights Social interaction Dignity Intellectual freedom Human behavior ab: The article explores the complexity of the rights of privacy. It is inferred that privacy has a strong agreement with literature because it morally either enhances autonomy and human dignity or because it provides space for the maintenance of one's intimate social relationship. It focuses on the issue on whether a right to privacy is derivable from other more fundamental rights such as the right to own property. It argues on the distinctiveness of privacy which is against the reductionist thesis of J. Thomson. It also suggests that the debate between control and separation theorists is a false dilemma as well as discusses personal separateness which is necessary for privacy. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: © 2019 Hegeler Institute. item: Monist holder: Oxford University Press / USA dt: @attributes: year: 2008 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|