Naturalizing the essential tension.

Kuhn’s “essential tension” between conservative and innovative imperatives in enquiry has an empirical analogue—between the potential benefits of collectivization of enquiry and the social dynamic impediments to effective sharing of information and insights in collective settings. A range of empiric...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Synthese Vol. 162; no. 2; pp. 275 - 309
Autor principal: D’Agostino, Fred
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Springer Nature May2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=35076097&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 35076097
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00397857
        4LI
      jtl: Synthese
      issn: 00397857
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: May2008
      vid: 162
      iid: 2
      pid: 237
      pub: Springer Nature
    artinfo:
      ui:
        35076097
        10.1007/s11229-007-9192-7
      ppf: 275
      ppct: 34
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
            size: 345KB
      tig:
        atl: Naturalizing the essential tension.
      aug:
        au: D’Agostino, Fred
        affil: Faculty of Arts , University of Queensland , Forgan Smith Building Brisbane 4072 Australia
      su:
        Kuhn, Thomas S., 1922-1996
        Social epistemology
        Theory of knowledge
        Social comparison
        Bounded rationality
      sug:
        subj:
          Kuhn, Thomas S., 1922-1996
          Social epistemology
          Theory of knowledge
          Social comparison
          Bounded rationality
      keyword:
        Assembly bonus
        Fuller
        Hidden profile
        Kuhn
        Naturalizing
        Risk-spreading
      ab: Kuhn’s “essential tension” between conservative and innovative imperatives in enquiry has an empirical analogue—between the potential benefits of collectivization of enquiry and the social dynamic impediments to effective sharing of information and insights in collective settings. A range of empirical materials from social psychology and organization theory are considered which bear on the issue of balancing these opposing forces and an institution is described in which they are balanced in a way which is appropriate for collective knowledge production.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Synthese is a copyright of Springer, 2008. All Rights Reserved.
      item: Synthese
      holder: Springer Nature
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2008
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N