Human or Not?

The article discusses the 2008 Loebner Prize competition in which computer programs are pitted against human judges. The judges must ascertain whether they are conversing with a human or a computer. The author explores the 1950 suggestion by mathematician Alan M. Turing that computers could be said...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Communications of the ACM Vol. 51; no. 12; p. 15
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Association for Computing Machinery Dec2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=35609265&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 35609265
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00010782
        ACM
      jtl: Communications of the ACM
      issn: 00010782
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Dec2008
      vid: 51
      iid: 12
      pid: 68
      pub: Association for Computing Machinery
    artinfo:
      ui: 35609265
      ppf: 15
      ppct: 0
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Human or Not?
      aug:
      su:
        Human-computer interaction
        Computer software research
        Economic competition
        Mathematics
        Turing, Alan Mathison, 1912-1954
        Conversation
        Computer science research
      sug:
        subj:
          Human-computer interaction
          Computer software research
          Economic competition
          Mathematics
          Turing, Alan Mathison, 1912-1954
          Conversation
          Computer science research
      ab: The article discusses the 2008 Loebner Prize competition in which computer programs are pitted against human judges. The judges must ascertain whether they are conversing with a human or a computer. The author explores the 1950 suggestion by mathematician Alan M. Turing that computers could be said to be thinking if, in a text-based conversation, one could not distinguish the computer's response from a human's response. The article reports that in the 2008 competition, each of the judges was fooled by one of the six programs.
      pubtype: Periodical
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2008
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N