From Joseph to Daniel: The Literary Development of the Narrative in Daniel 2.

Scholars have recognized the composite nature of the narrative in Daniel 2 based upon certain contradictions within the story. Additional evidence will be marshaled to bolster this claim, including variation in the use of divine names according to the evidence of the Old Greek version. Furthermore,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Vetus Testamentum Vol. 59; no. 1; pp. 123 - 150
Autor principal: Segal, Michael
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Brill Academic Publishers Jan2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=36165937&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 36165937
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00424935
        C6B
      jtl: Vetus Testamentum
      issn: 00424935
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Jan2009
      vid: 59
      iid: 1
      pid: 639
      pub: Brill Academic Publishers
    artinfo:
      ui:
        36165937
        10.1163/156853308X388110
      ppf: 123
      ppct: 27
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
            size: 250KB
      tig:
        atl: From Joseph to Daniel: The Literary Development of the Narrative in Daniel 2.
      aug:
        au: Segal, Michael
        affil: Hebrew University, Jerusalem
      su:
        Daniel (Biblical figure)
        Literature
        Narratives
        Old Testament
        Antiochus IV, King of Syria, ca. 215 B.C.-164 B.C.
      sug:
        subj:
          Daniel (Biblical figure)
          Literature
          Narratives
          Old Testament
          Antiochus IV, King of Syria, ca. 215 B.C.-164 B.C.
      keyword:
        ANTIOCHUS IV
        Daniel
        Joseph
        OLD GREEK
      ab: Scholars have recognized the composite nature of the narrative in Daniel 2 based upon certain contradictions within the story. Additional evidence will be marshaled to bolster this claim, including variation in the use of divine names according to the evidence of the Old Greek version. Furthermore, I suggest that a more precise division of the source material can be obtained based upon a philological analysis of the expression (v. 14), and its Akkadian cognates. The earlier stratum of the story presents Daniel as a “second” Joseph, and closely parallels both the story of Genesis 41 and the tale in Daniel 5. The secondary section is analyzed in an appendix in an attempt to identify its literary and historical context, with special attention given to the relationship between the description of God in 2:21 and the depiction of Antiochus IV Epiphanes in Daniel 7:24-26.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of Vetus Testamentum is the property of Brill Academic Publishers and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: Vetus Testamentum
      holder: Brill Academic Publishers
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2009
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N