Representing Subjects, Mind-dependent Objects.
The article explores the relationship between the positions of philosophers Immanuel Kant and Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz about the representation of subjects and mind-dependent objects. It compares the positions of the two philosophers regarding the relationship between knowing subjects and known obj...
| Publicado en: | British Journal for the History of Philosophy Vol. 17; no. 1; pp. 133 - 152 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis Ltd
Jan2009
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=36243880&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 36243880 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 09608788 5AX jtl: British Journal for the History of Philosophy issn: 09608788 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Jan2009 vid: 17 iid: 1 pid: 377 pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd artinfo: ui: 36243880 10.1080/09608780802548390 ppf: 133 ppct: 19 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P size: 141KB tig: atl: Representing Subjects, Mind-dependent Objects. aug: au: Nunziante, Antonio-Maria Vanzo, Alberto affil: Università di Padova University of Essex su: Subject (Philosophy) Object (Philosophy) Kant, Immanuel, 1724-1804 Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm, Freiherr von, 1646-1716 Philosophers Subjectivity Thought & thinking Humanities Philosophy sug: subj: Subject (Philosophy) Object (Philosophy) Kant, Immanuel, 1724-1804 Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm, Freiherr von, 1646-1716 Philosophers Subjectivity Thought & thinking Humanities Philosophy ab: The article explores the relationship between the positions of philosophers Immanuel Kant and Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz about the representation of subjects and mind-dependent objects. It compares the positions of the two philosophers regarding the relationship between knowing subjects and known objects. Two important aspects of the relationship between their philosophies are discussed, including the fundamental divergence highlighted by amphiboly and the stark contrast between their philosophies about the status of knowing subjects. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Copyright of British Journal for the History of Philosophy is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. item: British Journal for the History of Philosophy holder: Taylor & Francis Ltd dt: @attributes: year: 2009 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|