A logical formalization of the OCC theory of emotions.
In this paper, we provide a logical formalization of the emotion triggering process and of its relationship with mental attitudes, as described in Ortony, Clore, and Collins’s theory. We argue that modal logics are particularly adapted to represent agents’ mental attitudes and to reason about them,...
| Publicado en: | Synthese Vol. 168; no. 2; pp. 201 - 249 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Springer Nature
May2009
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=37254816&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 37254816 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 00397857 4LI jtl: Synthese issn: 00397857 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: May2009 vid: 168 iid: 2 pid: 237 pub: Springer Nature artinfo: ui: 37254816 10.1007/s11229-009-9460-9 ppf: 201 ppct: 48 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P size: 455KB tig: atl: A logical formalization of the OCC theory of emotions. aug: au: Adam, C. Herzig, A. Longin, D. affil: RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia Institut de Recherche en Informatique de Toulouse, Université de Toulouse, CNRS, Toulouse, France su: Formalization (Philosophy) Emotions & cognition Modal logic Logic Philosophy Brain damage sug: subj: Formalization (Philosophy) Emotions & cognition Modal logic Logic Philosophy Brain damage keyword: BDI agents Emotions Modal logics OCC theory ab: In this paper, we provide a logical formalization of the emotion triggering process and of its relationship with mental attitudes, as described in Ortony, Clore, and Collins’s theory. We argue that modal logics are particularly adapted to represent agents’ mental attitudes and to reason about them, and use a specific modal logic that we call Logic of Emotions in order to provide logical definitions of all but two of their 22 emotions. While these definitions may be subject to debate, we show that they allow to reason about emotions and to draw interesting conclusions from the theory. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Synthese is a copyright of Springer, 2009. All Rights Reserved. item: Synthese holder: Springer Nature dt: @attributes: year: 2009 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|