Evaluating Dialectical Structures.
This paper develops concepts and procedures for the evaluation of complex debates. They provide means for answering such questions as whether a thesis has to be considered as proven or disproven in a debate or who carries a burden of proof. While being based on classical logic, this framework repres...
| Publicado en: | Journal of Philosophical Logic Vol. 38; no. 3; pp. 283 - 313 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Springer Nature
Jun2009
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=38798526&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 38798526 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 00223611 JPH jtl: Journal of Philosophical Logic issn: 00223611 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Jun2009 vid: 38 iid: 3 pid: 237 pub: Springer Nature artinfo: ui: 38798526 10.1007/s10992-008-9091-5 ppf: 283 ppct: 30 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P size: 567KB tig: atl: Evaluating Dialectical Structures. aug: au: Betz, Gregor affil: Institute of Philosophy, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin Germany su: Relational dialectics theory Debate Question (Logic) Structural frames Academic dissertations Reasoning Psychology sug: subj: Relational dialectics theory Debate Question (Logic) Structural frames Academic dissertations Reasoning Psychology keyword: Argumentation Argumentation framework Burden of proof Defeasible reasoning Dialectics Non monotonic reasoning Non-monotonic reasoning ab: This paper develops concepts and procedures for the evaluation of complex debates. They provide means for answering such questions as whether a thesis has to be considered as proven or disproven in a debate or who carries a burden of proof. While being based on classical logic, this framework represents an (argument-based) approach to non-monotonic, or defeasible reasoning. Debates are analysed as dialectical structures, i.e. argumentation systems with an attack- as well as a support-relationship. The recursive status assignment over the arguments is conditionalised on proponents in a debate. The problem of multiple status assignments arising on circular structures is solved by showing that uniqueness can be guaranteed qua reconstruction of a debate. The notion of burden of proof as well as other discursive aims rational proponents pursue in a debate is defined within the framework. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Journal of Philosophical Logic is a copyright of Springer, 2009. All Rights Reserved. item: Journal of Philosophical Logic holder: Springer Nature dt: @attributes: year: 2009 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|