Two Kinds of Observation: Why van Fraassen Was Right to Make a Distinction, but Made the Wrong One.
Comments on the epistemic distinction made by empiricist van Fraassen regarding the observation of objects with the naked eye. Details on the principle of diffraction; Importance of the inhomogeneity function of objects for the inverse Fourier transform of perturbed waves; Comparison between ordina...
| Publicado en: | Philosophy of Science Vol. 67; no. 3; pp. 355 - 366 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Cambridge University Press
Sep2000
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=3930704&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 3930704 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 00318248 PSC jtl: Philosophy of Science issn: 00318248 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Sep2000 vid: 67 iid: 3 pid: 15979 pub: Cambridge University Press artinfo: ui: 3930704 10.1086/392785 ppf: 355 ppct: 11 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P size: 649KB tig: atl: Two Kinds of Observation: Why van Fraassen Was Right to Make a Distinction, but Made the Wrong One. aug: au: Vollmer, Sara su: Epistemics Optical diffraction sug: subj: Epistemics Optical diffraction ab: Comments on the epistemic distinction made by empiricist van Fraassen regarding the observation of objects with the naked eye. Details on the principle of diffraction; Importance of the inhomogeneity function of objects for the inverse Fourier transform of perturbed waves; Comparison between ordinary visual and instrument-assisted observations. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Copyright of Philosophy of Science is the property of Cambridge University Press and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. item: Philosophy of Science holder: Cambridge University Press dt: @attributes: year: 2000 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|