LA RAZIONALITÀ DEL RISPONDERE NON LOGICAMENTE.

In this paper, I discuss whether in the Wason selection task, where subjects are asked to select evidence for evaluating a conditional, the most common response is indeed as irrational as many psychologists have maintained. My account of subjects' performances focuses on (i) how the task is understo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Epistemologia Vol. 31; no. 2; pp. 263 - 278
Main Author: Labinaz, Paolo
Format: Article
Published: Springer Nature jul-dic2008
Subjects:
Online Access:View this record in EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=39979278&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 39979278
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        03929760
        1C1A
      jtl: Epistemologia
      issn: 03929760
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: jul-dic2008
      vid: 31
      iid: 2
      pid: 26615
      pub: Springer Nature
    artinfo:
      ui: 39979278
      ppf: 263
      ppct: 15
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
            size: 96KB
      tig:
        atl: LA RAZIONALITÀ DEL RISPONDERE NON LOGICAMENTE.
      aug:
        au: Labinaz, Paolo
        affil: Dipartimento di Filosofia, Università degli Studi di Trieste
      su:
        Tasks
        Conditioned response
        Reason
        Psychologists
        Task performance
        Psychology
      sug:
        subj:
          Tasks
          Conditioned response
          Reason
          Psychologists
          Task performance
          Psychology
      ab: In this paper, I discuss whether in the Wason selection task, where subjects are asked to select evidence for evaluating a conditional, the most common response is indeed as irrational as many psychologists have maintained. My account of subjects' performances focuses on (i) how the task is understood by the subjects and (ii) whether their performances can be seen as cases not so much of conditional reasoning, as of hypothesis testing. On this basis and in accordance with Grice's account of indicative conditionals, I suppose that normally people understand the conditional as involving a "strong" connection between the antecedent and the consequent. Whenever the inference to such a connection is not blocked, subjects will inductively test whether it holds, as they do in ordinary life with reference to wider domains than the narrow one provided by the experimental context. Thus, relative to their goals, their performance could be considered as rational.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: Italian
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of Epistemologia is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: Epistemologia
      holder: Springer Nature
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2008
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N