The Limits of Studies in Comparative Development of East Asia and Latin America: the case of land reform and agrarian policies.
This paper critically examines the widespread belief that the early implementation of comprehensive land reforms prior to the industrialisation process, coupled with subsequent agrarian state policies channelling the intersectoral transfer of resources, has been a central determinant of East Asia's...
| Published in: | Third World Quarterly Vol. 30; no. 4; pp. 761 - 778 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , |
| Format: | Article |
| Published: |
Taylor & Francis Ltd
Jun2009
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | View this record in EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=41130505&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 41130505 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 01436597 TWQ jtl: Third World Quarterly issn: 01436597 maglogo: Y pubinfo: dt: Jun2009 vid: 30 iid: 4 pid: 377 pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd artinfo: ui: 41130505 10.1080/01436590902867243 ppf: 761 ppct: 17 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P size: 143KB tig: atl: The Limits of Studies in Comparative Development of East Asia and Latin America: the case of land reform and agrarian policies. aug: au: Grinberg, Nicolas Starosta, Guido affil: Department of Economic History, London School of Economics, Houghton Street, London, WC2A 2AE, UK su: Economic conditions in East Asia Land reform Agricultural economics Rent (Economic theory) Taiwan South Korea sug: subj: Taiwan South Korea Economic conditions in East Asia Land reform Agricultural economics Rent (Economic theory) ab: This paper critically examines the widespread belief that the early implementation of comprehensive land reforms prior to the industrialisation process, coupled with subsequent agrarian state policies channelling the intersectoral transfer of resources, has been a central determinant of East Asia's (mainly Taiwan's and South Korea's) outperformance of Latin America. We argue that, although those agrarian policies should certainly be part of any comparative investigation of the course of capitalist development in each of these two regions, they cannot explain their divergence. The paper contends that the respective scope and timing of agrarian policies has been an expression of the specific contradictions of the early industrialisation process in each region, rather than an autonomous determinant of the course of the latter. Based on insights derived from the Marxian critique of political economy, the paper shows that each region's respective agrarian policies have expressed the differential resolution of the opposition between the rate of profit (industrial capital) and ground-rent (landed property) in the import substituting industrialisation process. In so doing, the paper takes issue with the claim that timely land reforms in Taiwan and Korea have facilitated the subsequent successful turn to an export-oriented industrialisation strategy. An alternative account of the different developmental paths in East Asia and Latin America based on the unfolding of the Marxian 'law of value' on a world scale is also provided. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Copyright of Third World Quarterly is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. item: Third World Quarterly holder: Taylor & Francis Ltd dt: @attributes: year: 2009 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|