WHAT IF LUKE HAD NEVER MET THEOPHILUS?

Asking the 'what if ?' questions of virtual history is a way of rubbing our noses in history's essential contingency—in the fact that things could have been different, that human choices (among other contingencies) actually matter. And of all history's contingencies, those of authorship seem—at leas...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Biblical Interpretation Vol. 8; no. 1/2; pp. 161 - 171
Autor principal: Alexander, Loveday C.A.
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Brill Academic Publishers Apr2000
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=4169345&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 4169345
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        09272569
        C1F
      jtl: Biblical Interpretation
      issn: 09272569
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Apr2000
      vid: 8
      iid: 1/2
      pid: 639
      pub: Brill Academic Publishers
    artinfo:
      ui:
        4169345
        10.1163/156851500750119141
      ppf: 161
      ppct: 10
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
            size: 167KB
      tig:
        atl: WHAT IF LUKE HAD NEVER MET THEOPHILUS?
      aug:
        au: Alexander, Loveday C.A.
        affil: University of Sheffield
      su:
        Bible. Luke
        Theophilus (Biblical figure)
        Luke, the Apostle, Saint
        Criticism
      sug:
        subj:
          Bible. Luke
          Theophilus (Biblical figure)
          Luke, the Apostle, Saint
          Criticism
      ab: Asking the 'what if ?' questions of virtual history is a way of rubbing our noses in history's essential contingency—in the fact that things could have been different, that human choices (among other contingencies) actually matter. And of all history's contingencies, those of authorship seem—at least to those of us who are authors—the most precarious imaginable. With Luke we are dealing with an author who seems particularly sensitive to the delicate combinations of forces, both communal and individual, that hedge about the articulation of the word. Asking 'What if Luke had never met Theophilus?' is in the end an invitation to consider the possibility of the non-existence of Luke's Gospel and Acts. Can we imagine the New Testament without these two texts (which together make up 25% of its bulk)?
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of Biblical Interpretation is the property of Brill Academic Publishers and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: Biblical Interpretation
      holder: Brill Academic Publishers
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2000
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N