WHAT IF PAUL HAD TRAVELLED EAST RATHER THAN WEST?

For first-century Jews the eastern disapora was at least as important as the western. When Paul returned from Arabia (Nabatea) to Damascus, his intention was to travel east from Damascus to Mesopotamia, where the synagogue communities, descendants of the original exiles of both northern and southern...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Biblical Interpretation Vol. 8; no. 1/2; pp. 171 - 185
Main Author: Bauckham, Richard
Format: Article
Published: Brill Academic Publishers Apr2000
Subjects:
Online Access:View this record in EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=4169346&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 4169346
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        09272569
        C1F
      jtl: Biblical Interpretation
      issn: 09272569
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Apr2000
      vid: 8
      iid: 1/2
      pid: 639
      pub: Brill Academic Publishers
    artinfo:
      ui:
        4169346
        10.1163/156851500750119150
      ppf: 171
      ppct: 14
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
            size: 156KB
      tig:
        atl: WHAT IF PAUL HAD TRAVELLED EAST RATHER THAN WEST?
      aug:
        au: Bauckham, Richard
        affil: University of St. Andrews
      su:
        Paul, the Apostle, Saint
        New Testament
        Jewish diaspora
        Jewish history
      sug:
        subj:
          Paul, the Apostle, Saint
          New Testament
          Jewish diaspora
          Jewish history
      ab: For first-century Jews the eastern disapora was at least as important as the western. When Paul returned from Arabia (Nabatea) to Damascus, his intention was to travel east from Damascus to Mesopotamia, where the synagogue communities, descendants of the original exiles of both northern and southern tribes of Israel, would have been his starting point for mission to the Gentiles of the area. But when he escaped arrest by the Nabatean ethnarc, Nabatean control of the trade routes south and east of Damascus left him no choice but to travel to Jerusalem, where he re-thought the geographical scope of his mission. Had Paul travelled east, the Christian communities of both north and south Mesopotamia might have flourished already in the first century and Paul's writings might have had more influence on Syriac theology. Considering how Christianity in the Roman Empire would have developed without Paul entails rejecting such exaggerated views of Paul's significance as that Paul invented Christianity or that without Paul Christianity would have remained a Jewish sect. The Gentile mission began without Paul and took place in areas, such as Rome and Egypt, which were not evangelized by Paul. Without Paul much would have been different about the way the early Christian movement would have spread across the Roman Empire, but it would still have spread, with much the same long-term effects.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of Biblical Interpretation is the property of Brill Academic Publishers and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: Biblical Interpretation
      holder: Brill Academic Publishers
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2000
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N